Brown and Mandelson must be prepared to act over bank bonuses

February 9, 2009 1:25 pm

By Andy ReedRBS

The Prime Minister has insisted there should be “no reward for failure” at banks which have had to be bailed out by the taxpayer.

Gordon Brown was speaking after reports Royal Bank of Scotland is considering awarding large bonuses, despite expectations of huge annual losses. However Gordon then stopped short of saying the government would impose a salary cap on rescued banks. This is despite last Wednesday President Obama capping executive pay at rescued US banks.

I had hoped that Prime Minister Gordon Brown would follow up his tough words with action if the banks failed to heed his warning.

I am sure there are lots of good technical reasons why some bonuses should be paid to low paid staff – but I think it is morally indefensible at this time to allow anybody else to benefit. These are the people who have brought the global economy to its knees. sadly we have to entrust them to help us get back out of the mess they created but they shouldn’t be paid bonuses to do so. The public rightly expect them to be eating humble pie – not paying themselves fat bonuses. I hope Gordon and Peter Mandelson back up their strong words if the RBS is daft enough to try to pay bonuses.

This is a great example of where Ministers need to act and think politically as well as technocrats. It is a tough call much of the time as I learned in my 2 years in the Treasury Team with Gordon Brown. Ironically there is probably nobody else who thinks so politically and strategically every minute of the day.

This is where there is a danger of the public disengaging with us. Quite rightly they feel the bankers got us into this mess. They never had much taste for their massive bonuses anyway but now they look grotesque. There is not technical argument that will convince the public that bankers deserve anything other than to suffer like the rest of us. Yes we need them to help us out of the mess they got us into but we certainly shouldn’t be afraid of bankers being poached as an excuse for having to pay bonuses. I am sure there are lots available to fill vacancies.

Even the Church of England Synod will be taking time this week to discuss the moral implications of the financial crisis. Perhaps we need to spend a little more time in lifting our heads from the technical measures needed to keep the economy afloat and – in a phrase I hate – to create a narrative about what we are doing and why. And to do it in a way that chimes with the public. I am sure they are ahead of us on this one and would welcome a tougher stance.

If RBS go ahead and pay bonuses I will be left with no morally defensible explanation to my constituents why a bank bailed out by them as taxpayers is then giving away their money to failed bankers. Sometimes we just need to see it in these stark and simple terms and say its wrong and ACT.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →