No, Ms James, the LGBT community has no duty to vote Conservative

April 14, 2009 1:38 pm

By Jonty PryorTories LGBT

Now, let me begin by saying that I believe nobody has a ‘duty’ to vote for a specific party. The beauty of democracy is you can choose who you feel best represents you, your ideals and who will best lead the country. I am of course referencing Ms James, the conservative parliamentary candidate for Stourbridge who informed myself and other members of the LGBT community that we have a duty to vote Tory.

Well Ms James, no thanks.

She tells us that the Conservative party has changed across the country – not just in David Cameron’s rhetoric. Let’s consider. On the 6th of April this year new laws came into force meaning that lesbians have equal access to fertility treatment on the NHS. On top of this, the biological mother and her partner can both appear on the birth certificate. This – for the first time – enshrines a two mother family in law.

Gordon Brown led 230 of his MPs to introduce this law and to equality for LGBT people. David Cameron led 92% of his voting MPs to say that LGBT people are second class citizens, a vote that said Lesbians are unsuitable mothers and need the guiding hand of a man. I have no duty to vote for the Conservatives.

The leader of the Conservative Party may be saying some nice things about gay people but his votes simply do not reflect this and I dread to think how gay rights will deteriorate under Cameron’s Britain.

The past 12 years have seen the introduction of Civil Partnerships, an equal age of consent, the repeal of section 28, the introduction of discrimination laws, ended the banning of LGBT people serving in the military, increased sentencing for hate crimes, produced and implemented the Gender Recognition Act and given LGBT people the right to adopt children. So if it comes to a choice between Cameron’s kind words or Gordon Brown and Labour Party action, I’ll stick with Labour.

So where do we go from here? I hear many calling for full Gay Marriage, others for Civil Partnerships across the board leaving Marriage to the religions. Others want the entitlement to donate blood. But I believe that Labour in Europe need to now push for Civil Partnerships across the EU. This would introduce equality laws for those in countries such as Poland and Romania. It would also mean that countries wanting to join the EU such as Turkey would have to accept that they cannot treat certain demographs in their own country as an under-class.

Back in the UK, perhaps LGBT people don’t have a duty to vote Labour. (I’m not usually one to say that a single issue should decide your vote.) But the Conservatives believe that we don’t deserve or need equality under the law, and unfortunately the Liberal Democrats are – as usual – in a position to say some pie-in-the-sky things because they’ll never implement them. If you want LGBT rights only the progressive polices of the Labour Party can deliver them.

We are yet to achieve full equality but we are making steady progress; progress that can happen and will happen under a Labour Government.

Related posts:

  1. For all our progress, Labour must not take the gay vote for granted
  2. This is what it will mean to have a Conservative government
  3. The Conservative Enemy: One – the Taxpayers’ Alliance
  4. New farce: either not Conservative, or not Unionist
  5. The Conservative Enemy: Two – The Landowners

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →