Continuing the fight: Proposition 8 demonstrates how easily our hard won rights can be undermined

May 29, 2009 4:12 pm

Tories LGBTThis article was first posted on Progress Online.

The Californian Supreme Court delivered a devastating setback to proponents of marriage equality on Tuesday when it ruled that the November ballot measure – Proposition 8 – which amended the Californian State Constitution to ban same sex marriage, was valid.

The ruling sparked demonstrations throughout the state of California where supporters and celebrities held vigils but were met with noticeable silence from the White House, whose rhetoric on gay rights has yet to be matched with tangible action.

Many in the campaign for marriage equality will now wonder where their movement goes from here, with the next Californian gubernational elections not scheduled until November 2010 and with little indication that any ballot would produce a different result.

In the short term there is no doubt that the ruling is a debilitating set back to those 18,000 same sex married couples in California as well as supporters of equality right across the United States. More than two dozen states now have constitutional amendments that define marriage as a union between a man and woman – and the South and the West appear to be overwhelmingly against any change to this definition of marriage. The pattern has been that every time voters have a say on this matter, they choose to vote overwhelmingly against the rights of lesbian and gay partners.

This fight will continue in California and across the United States and Tuesday will mark a new chapter in the campaign for marriage equality. At the same time as the ruling was being announced in California, President Obama was announcing his first nomination to the Supreme Court in the shape of Sonia Sotomayor. Although her stance on gay marriage is not yet widely known, her empathy with minority rights has been documented following comments which stated that her experience as a minority allowed her to draw better conclusions than those of a white male.

The ruling is also likely to galvanize the campaign for same sex marriage rights. Any sense of inevitability that may have set in following landmark decisions to legalize same sex unions in five states – Massachusetts, Iowa, Vermont, Connecticut and Maine (at least three others, New York, New Jersey and New Hampshire, are seriously considering the matter) – have now been banished.

This lesson from California should serve as a stark warning to those who value our hard won equality in Britain. A friend of mine who worked on the ‘No on Prop 8‘ campaign based in San Francisco repeatedly decried the complacency she met on a daily basis. People could not comprehend that California, the home of Harvey Milk and the cradle of American liberalism, could remove the civil rights of an entire group of people in the state. Hard won rights can so easily be undermined; with the far right on the march in Britain and Europe we should never assume that our remarkable progress is forever embedded.

With a Conservative government potentially less than a year away, we should not forget that Cameron’s warm words do not hide his party’s voting record. According to Liberal Democrat research, 80% of the current Shadow Cabinet has voted against gay rights in the ten years since Labour took office. Cameron has called the gay rights movement a “fringe agenda” and he led his Members in voting against protecting lesbian and gay people from those who call for their execution. Cameron’s party Chair, Eric Pickles, has never voted on gay equality and Sayeeda Warsi, his Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion and Social Action, has accused Labour of “allowing school children to be propositioned for homosexual relationships“, and went on to denounce the “promotion of homosexuality that undermines family life“.

I don’t imagine for a second that David Cameron would walk confidently in to Downing Street hell bent on undoing equality legislation, but when in Government, political deals have to be made and it will be the reversal of gay rights offered as appeasement to anxious backbenchers.

There is little time for complacency when there is still so much to do. Gay rights are undermined and threatened in many parts of Europe, civil partnerships are not recognised across the continent and homophobia remains rife in schools. These are the challenges we now face and we will only continue our remarkable progress by ensuring we have friends in government – both in Britain and in Europe – and not the far right.

Related posts:

  1. Disability Rights: Now is Labour’s chance!
  2. Cameron’s threat to your rights
  3. Gays, God and the Law: difference is not inequality, and tolerance doesn’t always trump faith
  4. Settlement rights for Gurkhas announced
  5. Harriet Harman shouldn’t be blogging on International Women’s Day – she’s suppressed women’s rights for 12 years

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →