Grotesque racism and sexism: the truth about Oxford’s Conservative Association

June 15, 2009 7:19 pm

OUCABy Lewis Goodall

CORRECTION: The individual who was punched has contacted LabourList to deny that he leaked the story to the student press and informs us that it was the former President of OUCA, not the current President, who attacked him.

If David Cameron really wants to show that the Conservative Party has changed, some sound advice might be to tell the Oxford University Conservative Association (OUCA) to shut up and keep quiet.

I preface this by saying there are many good, decent and ‘sound’ members of the Association; they are honest conservatives and simply possess an ideology that is different to our own.

Some, however, (and I emphasise that it is a minority) truly are sexist, (at least casually) racist, snobbish scumbags. They’re not joking, they’re not being ironic and they deserve to be outed and shown up for the out of touch sorry anachronism that they truly are.

Barely a year goes by here in Oxford without an embarrassing story from the Association and this year is no different. During this year’s hustings for the Assocation’s termly elections, the candidates were asked the question no doubt on everyone’s minds, as to the most racist joke they knew and what was their least favourite minority.

Responses varied, one candidate responding with a joke about a black person hanging in a family tree and another coming up with this hilarious ditty: ‘What do you say when you see a television moving around in the dark? Drop it n*****’ . Words fail me.

You’d have thought the leaders of tomorrow might have had a little more sensitivity after the election of two BNP MEPs. One member has since resigned, but few know that the President apparently decided to take ‘disciplinary matters’ into his own hands by punching the guy who leaked the story to the student press.

Had this been a mere isolated incident, we could all overlook it as an example of ill judged and immature student hi-jinks; alas, this isn’t the first time.

In 2004 OUCA’s Treasurer was expelled for making racist comments about India and in 2000 four members shocked the university by making ‘Nazi style salutes’ at a meeting. Its sexism is also notorious; its weekly meetings, ‘Port and Policy’, are infamous for their rowdy sexist outbursts. On the OUCA section of the website ‘Oxford Gossip’ a current popular poll asks its readers to choose their ‘hottest OUCA babe.’ Recently, one OUCA female member said of the organisation: “It seems that the men are there to do the debating and the women to pour the port.” Most offensive of all is how these members believe that this prejudice is simply ‘banter.’ Rather, such sexist (and to a lesser extent) racist attitudes are embedded and institutionalised.

Why does any of this matter? It matters because this is a society that tells its members that they are likely to be the Tory frontbenchers of tomorrow; indeed, they probably will be. Former presidents of OUCA include Margaret Thatcher (its patron), William Hague (its honourary president), Ted Heath, Jonathan Aitken, Lord Rees-Mogg and William Waldegrave, to name but a few.

Make no mistake, future Tory benches will be made up of a fair share of OUCA alumni. We all ought to be worried that the club that sent Margaret Thatcher into the political world seems to have regressed into a sorry anachronism of gentlemen’s Baldwinesque backroom conservatism, rather than a university branch of an apparently changed and renewed party. If these are the people to make up the Conservative governments of tomorrow, we should all care what is going on and what action they take.

OUCA and its members need to change. The members I’m talking about here have dragged the association to dark depths. They are living, breathing Tory twit stereotypes, the like of which I would not have believed still existed before studying at the university. They give Conservatives, Oxford and (quite frankly) human beings a bad name.

After the story broke, Michael Howard – who was due to address their end of term meal – pulled out after expressing his disgust at the events. I call on William Hague and Baroness Thatcher to likewise withdraw their names as honourary president and patron respectively. If nothing else, it would do their former club a lot of good, giving an impetus to eject some of the morons and reform the club. At least that way, the sexist, racist Oxford Tories won’t ever get off the ground. It would do OUCA, Oxford and ultimately the country, an awful lot of good.

Shadow Secretary of State Liam Fox is due to speak at an OUCA event tomorrow night, June 16th.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Affordable housing not fox hunting

    Affordable housing not fox hunting

    Attending my first Labour Conference as a Parliamentary Candidate (PPC) was always going to be an interesting experience. And whilst Conference was rightly focusing on the strategy to win our all important key seats in seven months time, both the fringe events and policy announcements showed that there is now a clear policy platform to allow us to take our One Nation Labour Party to the doorsteps of even the most challenging seats. Having been selected for a ‘safe’ Tory […]

    Read more →
  • News TSSA union members vote to keep poitical fund

    TSSA union members vote to keep poitical fund

    Members of the Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association (TSSA) trade union have voted to keep their political fund, which goes towards campaigning for policies to help their members, as well as reaffirming their links to the Labour Party. Unions have been required to ballot members on whether they want to keep their political fund every ten years ever since the Tories brought through the legislation in the 1980s – and since then there have been no high profile cases of members voting […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour and the rise of the machines

    Labour and the rise of the machines

    Technology is already transforming our homes in ways we could not have dreamed of only a few years ago, and these same technologies are altering how we work and interact. The impact of the automation of jobs and mechanisation has created increasing uncertainty surrounding the employment prospects of white-collar workers previously immune to such problems. At conference, Ed Balls was right to say that “across the developed world, rapid technological change is replacing traditional skilled jobs too – in banking […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour supporters want an EU referendum, latest poll finds

    Labour supporters want an EU referendum, latest poll finds

    A recent poll has found that 45% of Labour supporters are for a referendum on the EU, with 36% against it. The polling conducted by YouGov for think tank British Future between 14th and 15th September also found that when looked at in terms of the electorate as a whole 57%  of people are in favour of a referendum and only 23% are against. YouGov said that when asked, 52% of those who took part in the polls largely believed […]

    Read more →
  • News Are the Tories more likely to protect hedge funds than the NHS?

    Are the Tories more likely to protect hedge funds than the NHS?

    Well, yes – according to the people of Birmingham. It’s been reported that in his speech tomorrow David Cameron will attempt to claw back some legitimacy for the Tories when it comes to the NHS. But, it looks like Cameron’s latest policy announcement (where he’ll promise that by 2020 everyone in England will be able to access a GP every day of the week) will do little to undo the public’s belief that the Tories can’t be trusted with the […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y