Marks out of ten for the prospective speakers

June 15, 2009 5:50 pm

HustingsBy Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

The following are some of the key phrases I was able to jot down in the crowded committee room in Portcullis House as the prospective candidates for the position of Speaker gave their speeches. The marks out of ten are my own views for how the candidates performed, taking into account the content, delivery, relevance and overall recepetion of what they said:

SIR ALAN BEITH (Lib Dem) 8/10
“There needs to be a momentum for reform. We must concentrate on making Parliament effective.”

“We need to improve PMQs, which many people think is like a schoolyard, only worse.”

“We can bring in the public, petitions, e-consultations and we must learn to get out of Westminster. Indeed the House could occasionally sit outside Westminster.”

“No more secret lists of who’s going to speak and who’s not.”

PARMJIT DHANDA (Lab) 4/10
“The British people want plain, blunt English. They want the pendulum of power to sbe swung away from this place and into communities. You the people should be telling us what the issues are, not the other way round.”

“We need to move the aparatus of this place out into the communities.”

“Thew speaker has to champion parliament, but before that he or she has to reform it.”

RICHARD SHEPHERD (Con) 6/10
“I’m the back to the future candidate.”

“Parliament once meant something to this country. Now, some people think they’re the government. That’s the psycology that’s arisen.”

“The Commons is not the government; it’s the representatives are of every constituency and they are the checks and balances that challenge government.”

“This is not a game, it’s deadly serious.”

A speaker is not a governor of the government.

“All the candidates, we all believe in our country, out principle institution and its purposes.”

SIR GEORGE YOUNG (Con) 7/10
The Prime Minister is moving the debate away from personality and back on to politics. But the job of speaker is as much abour personality as it is about policy.”

“A speaker needs impartiality, authority, patience and leadership. He or she must be confident, self-assertive, accessible and relevant.”

“There was no prompt solution on expenses because the House has become too dependent on others and has lacked the leadership to get a grip. We need a more assertive House where government doesn’t take the initiative alone.”

“A speaker must be more referee than player, but he needs to give direction to help shape the tone of the House.”

ANN WIDDECOMBE (Con) 8/10
“I’m pretty unique. I’m the only candidate looking for an interim responsibility. In normal circumstances, I wouldn’t have dreamt of putting my name forward. But we must now be sharply focussed on the tasks for a sepcified period of time, who can then hand over to a fresh parliament.”

“What’s crucially important first and foremost is to restore trust and the reputation of parliament with the public. For that, we need someone who is known by the public, and someone who has the vulgar attributes which can connect with the public.”

“We need a shift of power away from the executive and back to parliament. It is quite wrong that we are governed by legislation that has not always been debated by parliament, let alone voted on by parliament.”

“I’ve consistently demonsrated independence.”

JOHN BERCOW (Con) 8/10
“We must restore trust in politics and we must pur parliament first in the allocation of strength, of scrutiny, of accessability – to those who work in it and those who come to it.”

“We must also ensure the next speaker is not a purely internal figure, inaccessible to the wider world. He or she needs to be an ambassador for parliament, meeting representatives of the civil society and explaining the role of parliament and acting as a listener to the wider public.”

“Parliament has changed before and it will change again.”

“As someone who has not stodd before, nor served in government, I can be the agent of necessary change.”

SIR ALAN HASELHURST (Con) 4/10
“I offer myself on the basis that at least you know something about me.”

I will bring topicality and relevance to proceedings.”

I’ve only ever been a backbencher. I am untainted by the whip’s office or frontbench duties of any kind.”

“”I’ve got lots of ideas for improving the power of the legislature over the executive. I will be more liberal in granting opportunities to debate matters that are urgent and relevant.”

“With expenses, the unsustainable bubble has burst. We now need a better balance of salaries to expenses.”

SIR PATRICK CORMACK (Con) 9/10
“I’m not standing just because we need a rounded figure!”

“The speaker must be both a servant and protector of the House. He or she must have a fearless impartiality ahainsty the arrogant assertion of power, not only from the exectuive, but often also from the executive in waiting.”

“Do we really want our elected representatives to be subject to an appointed quango?”

“We are the representatives, not the delegates, of the people.”

“People say I’m a traditionalist, but I don’t stand for flacid traditions>”

“We need to have a situation where petitions place an absolute obligation on parliament.”

“I love the House of Commons, but it;s not the House it was. There’s a terrible imbalance that’s got to be redressed.

“This has got to be a place where people can have fun and debate: the speaker therefore needs a sense of history, a sense of humour and a sense of ridiculousness.”

SIR MICHAEL LORD (Con) 7/10
“Out of all disatsers, great opportunities can come if we have the wit and the courage. Expectations are high – this is a golden opportunity.”

“As someone who’s always been a backbencher, I know backbenchers feel their votes do not count, that they’re too often lobby fodder.”

There are more ways the backbenchers can be called into debate. There should be debates on all matters, and non-binding votes on all debates to help guide the decisions of the government.”

“Today is not a time for false modesty. The next speaker will have to be strong. Playing as a young man against the South African ruby team showed me how to take the rough and tumble and how to act fairly amongst it.”

“The House of Commons is the best place in the world for democracy, the mother of parliaments.”

“I’m eager for change, and this is an opportunity we should seize.”

MARGARET BECKETT (Lab) 7/10
“I’ve chosen to stand because the next speaker will face a two way crisis of confidence: the public loss of confidence in us, and the members’ loss of faith in the House.”

“The devil is in the detail. We have to look carefully and not rush things.”

“To my mind the speaker is the servant of the House, not someone who can direct it.”

“Our circumstances are unprecedented. Over the next 3-4 years we could see a change in relationship between the two Houses of Parliament. Parliament will have new members; there could be a hung parliament or a close parliament. In those circumstances the role of speaker is crucial and delicate.”

“For those with concerns that I am too partisan, I say I have been the leader of the House, chair of a range of committees including for the United Nationps. I’ve proven I am an effective and impartial and fair chair – last time this process occurred, I voted for George Young.”

“The public needs to feel that this is a House that puts their concerns first, and not our own.”

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →