Overlooked BBC interview with Jacqui Smith

June 29, 2009 1:12 pm

Author:

Share this Article

From @LabourList

An interview that former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith gave to the BBC World Service has gone largely unnoticed by commentators online. In the interview, Smith talks about the reasons for her resignation earlier this month. For the next few days, you can listen to the whole interview here but we’re also publishing the transcript of the discussion below:

Carrie Gracie: “We’ll come back to you and the government in a moment, but first the reputation of Westminster around the world. I mean, this is something that for hundreds of years has claimed to be the mother of parliament, just how much damage has Westminster and British politics sustained internationally?”

Jacqui Smith: “I think that’s a very interesting question. I think there is no doubt that there has been considerable damage in the UK. There’s been considerable damage to individual politicians’ reputations and more significantly actually to the nature of our parliamentary democracy, to Westminster as you say and there is a lot of work to be done to put that right and you know it’s started and I think the election of a new Speaker, I think the announcements made yesterday by the Leader of the House of Commons, Harriet Harman, about the Parliamentary Standards Bill that’s being brought forward, setting up an independent Parliamentary Standards Authority to take decisions about behaviour and allowances out of the hands of MPs and make them independent in the system. All of those things are important” .

Carrie Gracie: “Yes but that’s not dealing with the question which is the international damage. If you’re sitting in Nigeria or you’re sitting in China and you’ve been berated endlessly by various little parliamentary missions from Westminster coming and telling you how to run your democracy, what do you feel when you see all of this going on?”

Jacqui Smith: “I’ve never been on a parliamentary mission but I’m pretty clear they don’t berate other people. I mean I hope what they do is actually talk to people about the lessons that we’ve learned from having had a pretty long democracy but I was going to come on to the point that just before I resigned I was at a G8 Justice and Home Affairs meeting and what was interesting to me, yes these are politicians from developed countries, but all of them said they were amazed at the way in which the British media was addressing the issue of expenses “.

Carrie Gracie: “Was their point basically that their systems are far worse and that actually you came out smelling of roses?”

Jacqui Smith: “I don’t think that their systems are far worse. I think they said that they felt that the way that individuals had been picked off, the general…you know, almost hysterical approach to the expenses issue, was something that they were surprised at. They felt the behaviour from what they’d seen didn’t warrant it and actually they did and this comes back to your question – they did think that it was damaging probably of the UK’s reputation in a way that perhaps it didn’t deserve to be”.

Carrie Gracie: “So that’s the international dimension. What about the historical dimension? Several hundred years of Westminster democracy. We’re now seeing, you mentioned a moment ago, these new rules to change the system as Gordon Brown put it in a momentous way in terms of parliamentary history, do you feel ashamed to be part of a generation which has brought parliament to this?”

Jacqui Smith: “No, because I don’t believe, with one exception, that I acted in a way that didn’t fulfil the high standards that I set myself, I think that we should set ourselves as parliamentarians, so I don’t feel personally ashamed. I feel frustrated that perhaps in everything that I’ve sort of turned my mind to over the last twelve years as an MP I didn’t think to myself well perhaps we should be reforming the system, because I think and all of us have said this, we knew if we thought about it that it wasn’t a good system so I think there’s frustration with hindsight that perhaps we didn’t choose this as a priority but let’s not forget the point at which perhaps when I was Chief Whip I might have had more to say about it, actually there were lots of other things going on in government that I suspect at the time my constituents thought were more important. You know, the reforms that we were making to schools and hospitals, the way in which we were dealing with public services, the international work that we were doing and when you… you know, it’s easy in hindsight to say we should have done something about it, at the time it didn’t seem like the top priority.”

Carrie Gracie: “Now you said there was one exception about your expenses that you weren’t happy about, did require apology. What was that?”

Jacqui Smith: “That was when I mistakenly claimed for a television package that involved films that shouldn’t have been claimed for by the taxpayer. It was just wrong, it shouldn’t have come within a million miles of being claimed for ” .

Carrie Gracie: “Now for some of our audience who may not be familiar with this story, this was your husband, who also works for you in your constituency office and he had claimed for two adult or pornographic films under this package? “

Jacqui Smith: “Hm. A TV package in which you can get pay per view films in which yes, well in actual fact there were four of them, the excitement was about the two that were adult features, there were another two which equally I don’t think I should have claimed for which my kids watched, “Surf’s Up” and some other Disney film. Basically what we did is we claimed for the whole of the broadband and TV package in that month and in my view we shouldn’t have done and that’s why I paid back all of the difference between the basic connection of broadband to my second home and the amount that included the films. “

Carrie Gracie: “And if he hadn’t done that you’d still be Home Secretary?”

Jacqui Smith: “I don’t know whether or not that’s the case. You know it’s the Prime Minister that would have determined whether or not I was still Home Secretary. It was intensely embarrassing, it did bring immense pressure on to my family. You know, as you say, my husband’s worked with me for the last twelve years, he gave up a career as a civil engineer to support me and the work I do in the constituency and to help bring up our children, one of whom I’ve had since I was an MP. He’s come under immense pressure and I… part of the decision that I took was the reason I’ve been able to do my job I hope as effectively as I have done over the last twelve years is because I’ve had the support of my family. When they came under pressure it was right for me actually to give back them support as well”.

Carrie Gracie: “He made a public apology. Was that experience humiliating for you, both publicly and privately?”

Jacqui Smith: “Yes and for him, it was horrible.”

Carrie Gracie: “And presumably he apologised to you privately and to the children? “

Jacqui Smith: “Yes he did. Yes”.

Carrie Gracie: “And you’d already endured all these attacks over your public competence, your policies and your political judgement, but when you private life as you suggest is dragged into the public spotlight for savage criticism and indeed ridicule, just describe what that feels like because it’s an experience that most of us have not had and obviously would not wish to have. “

Jacqui Smith: “Well, having to fight your way out through TV cameras when you go out of your house in the morning, having press photographers outside your house for weeks on end is a real intrusion. It’s horrible. I could have coped with it on my own but my oldest son was doing, has just finished in fact, his GCSE’s, his quite important public examinations at sixteen in the UK and I just felt that it was not fair on all of them. After a while you know having your wife or your mum or your daughter or your sister called a liar and a thief by national newspapers and having to face that degree of scrutiny gets a bit wearing on the family and in many ways they’re less protected than I am. I had my office, I had my… I was engrossed in the work that I was doing that I thought was important. It’s much harder for them ” .

Carrie Gracie: “Now you are the first woman to have served as Home Secretary in this country, a notoriously macho department of government. Do you hope to be a role model for young women to follow? “

Jacqui Smith: “Yes I’ve always throughout the whole of my political career I’ve wanted to do that and I’ve wanted to support other women in coming into politics. Incidentally I always said about the role of Home Secretary that I thought it was amazing that there hadn’t been a woman in that job before because you know this is a job as I said that is about protecting our communities, our borders, our families, if that’s not women’s work then I’m not quite sure what is. I hope that there will be other women Home Secretaries and senior women wanting to come into politics. I think incidentally what’s happened in the last six months has probably made that more difficult “.

Carrie Gracie: “Not just that but quite a lot of women resigned from the front bench as you or just after you”.

Jacqui Smith: “Yes and I think that’s bad for the government and therefore bad for the country actually”.

Carrie Gracie: “Do you think it’s still a sexist politics in this country and I’m just thinking back to when you made your first appearance at the despatch box in the Commons as Home Secretary and there was more written about your cleavage and your appearance than about what you actually had to say? “

Jacqui Smith: “You know, I always used to say that I hadn’t myself suffered directly from it, I have actually in the last six months and I suppose I’ve become more….. When your colleagues on one of the sort of flagship political programmes, the Today programme, described me as being stroppy I think there’s something, dare I say it, gendered about that description “.

Carrie Gracie: “What, men are allowed to be stroppy, as in argumentative, feisty?”

Jacqui Smith: “I don’t think I’ve ever heard a man described as stroppy actually. I think that’s something about are you getting above yourself actually. a lot of language that has been used not only about me but about other women politicians as well that I just don’t think would be used about men actually and as I say, this isn’t sort of me whingeing “Oh it’s so difficult for me because I’m a women”, but I am worried that we have a politics and a political system in which women might be put off from standing because if you felt I’m not sure whether I want to put my family through what Jacqui Smith’s family has been through, that would be a bad thing because in this country we need a legislature, we need a government that is a team that represents a range of experiences and a range of talents, a range of life, that can be brought to that task” .

Carrie Gracie: “You talked earlier about being badly treated so it wasn’t badly treated by Number Ten, could you just…”

Jacqui Smith: “No, absolutely not”.

Carrie Gracie: “Could you just elucidate. Was it the media we’re talking about effectively or other parts of the political establishment?

Jacqui Smith: “I think I’ve had a harder time than some for less sin, let me put it that way, because I was the first person for which there were questions about my expenses”.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    “Work and home is what One Nation is about – family life, how people live everyday life.” That’s what Jon Cruddas – the man who will in all likelihood write Labour’s next manifesto – told the Guardian the party’s policy review is focused on. And it sounds so simple – doesn’t it? Critics will say it’s too simplistic a definition (and they’d be right – I’m cherry picking here), but it’s also a brilliant example of the distance between most [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s policy process explained

    Labour’s policy process explained

    There’s an interesting interview in the Guardian with Labour’s policy chief Jon Cruddas this morning (of which more later), but the Guardian have also sketched out their take on the shape of the party policy review, noting – as I’ve done before – that it will report back in a series of stages. You can see a more sophisticated look at this in the piece Jon Cruddas and Angela Eagle wrote for us earlier this week. Here’s the Guardian’s take: [...]

    Read more →