Cameron must be challenged on his new European “friends”

July 28, 2009 3:22 pm

KaminskyBy Mike Katz

Tory leader David Cameron’s decision to split from the mainstream centre-right European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament and ally his party’s MEPs with the dregs of Eastern European fascism in a new anti-federalist Brussels grouping is looking more questionable than ever.

The man Cameron nominated to be the new group’s leader in the European Parliament, Michal Kaminski of Poland’s Law and Order Party, has a history of denying war crimes against Jews – the sort of positions from which the Tory leader would run a million miles if they were aired in the UK.

Thanks to investigations in last week’s Observer, it has been confirmed that in 2001 Kaminski thought the then Polish President was wrong to officially apologise for the Jedwabne massacre of July 1941. (Research from Polish-American academic Jan T Gross concluded that Poles, with the help of some occupying Nazi troops, locked hundreds of Jews into a barn, and set it on fire).

Despite his refutations, the Observer’s research clearly shows that Kaminski (a member of the far-right anti-Semitic National Revival of Poland in the late 1980s) did indeed react by saying “I think that Mr President can apologise but for other things. He should withhold apologies for Jedwabne.”

The editor-in-chief of Nasza Polska, Piotr Jakucki, confirmed that Kaminski gave the 2001 interview. Maria Kaczynska, then a journalist with Gazeta Wspolczesna, recalls Kaminski’s role:

“I remember all of this very vividly. I had to be in Jedwabne to write about him. I saw him in Jedwabne. He had a big folder and he pulled out a file, a petition calling on locals not to participate in apologies to the Jews.”

In an accompanying piece in the same paper, columnist Nick Cohen rightly questions Cameron’s judgment in running towards anyone who might be anti-federalist in Europe without due diligence.

Cameron had plenty of opportunities to change his mind about one of the first pledges he made; that he would create a new European Parliamentary grouping. He could even have said that, having looked for possible partners, he wasn’t keen on the company he’d have to keep.

But no. Cameron’s dog-whistle politics for his backbenchers means his MEPs – with the honourable exception of Edward McMillan-Scott, who knows a fascist when he sees one, are breaking bread with some seriously nasty politicians.

Sadly, his Tory MEP colleague Dan Hannan is more representative of Cameron’s new European thinking, describing Kaminski on his blog for the Daily Telegraph as “a Thatcherite: a sturdy Polish patriot who is nonetheless, in outlook, almost a British Tory”.

Labour must make sure people don’t forget who Cameron chooses to be his friends and keep asking him why he thinks Kaminski is an acceptable leader of his party’s grouping in Europe. And we should also nail the Tory line that there are some dodgy views expressed in the ranks of the European Socialists’ group, so it’s honours even. Whilst this may or may not be the case, Cameron’s partners in Europe have policy platforms and leaderships with attitudes and policies which are racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic and hostile to travellers.

We cannot let this become a case of “out of sight, out of mind”. Cameron has legitimised and made friends with European fascists – we need to ensure he pays the political price for his Eurosceptic dogma.

Mike Katz is a vice-chair of the Jewish Labour Movement.

Photograph: The Guardian/Gerard Cerles/AFP/Getty Images

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →