Cameron must be challenged on his new European “friends”

July 28, 2009 3:22 pm

KaminskyBy Mike Katz

Tory leader David Cameron’s decision to split from the mainstream centre-right European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament and ally his party’s MEPs with the dregs of Eastern European fascism in a new anti-federalist Brussels grouping is looking more questionable than ever.

The man Cameron nominated to be the new group’s leader in the European Parliament, Michal Kaminski of Poland’s Law and Order Party, has a history of denying war crimes against Jews – the sort of positions from which the Tory leader would run a million miles if they were aired in the UK.

Thanks to investigations in last week’s Observer, it has been confirmed that in 2001 Kaminski thought the then Polish President was wrong to officially apologise for the Jedwabne massacre of July 1941. (Research from Polish-American academic Jan T Gross concluded that Poles, with the help of some occupying Nazi troops, locked hundreds of Jews into a barn, and set it on fire).

Despite his refutations, the Observer’s research clearly shows that Kaminski (a member of the far-right anti-Semitic National Revival of Poland in the late 1980s) did indeed react by saying “I think that Mr President can apologise but for other things. He should withhold apologies for Jedwabne.”

The editor-in-chief of Nasza Polska, Piotr Jakucki, confirmed that Kaminski gave the 2001 interview. Maria Kaczynska, then a journalist with Gazeta Wspolczesna, recalls Kaminski’s role:

“I remember all of this very vividly. I had to be in Jedwabne to write about him. I saw him in Jedwabne. He had a big folder and he pulled out a file, a petition calling on locals not to participate in apologies to the Jews.”

In an accompanying piece in the same paper, columnist Nick Cohen rightly questions Cameron’s judgment in running towards anyone who might be anti-federalist in Europe without due diligence.

Cameron had plenty of opportunities to change his mind about one of the first pledges he made; that he would create a new European Parliamentary grouping. He could even have said that, having looked for possible partners, he wasn’t keen on the company he’d have to keep.

But no. Cameron’s dog-whistle politics for his backbenchers means his MEPs – with the honourable exception of Edward McMillan-Scott, who knows a fascist when he sees one, are breaking bread with some seriously nasty politicians.

Sadly, his Tory MEP colleague Dan Hannan is more representative of Cameron’s new European thinking, describing Kaminski on his blog for the Daily Telegraph as “a Thatcherite: a sturdy Polish patriot who is nonetheless, in outlook, almost a British Tory”.

Labour must make sure people don’t forget who Cameron chooses to be his friends and keep asking him why he thinks Kaminski is an acceptable leader of his party’s grouping in Europe. And we should also nail the Tory line that there are some dodgy views expressed in the ranks of the European Socialists’ group, so it’s honours even. Whilst this may or may not be the case, Cameron’s partners in Europe have policy platforms and leaderships with attitudes and policies which are racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic and hostile to travellers.

We cannot let this become a case of “out of sight, out of mind”. Cameron has legitimised and made friends with European fascists – we need to ensure he pays the political price for his Eurosceptic dogma.

Mike Katz is a vice-chair of the Jewish Labour Movement.

Photograph: The Guardian/Gerard Cerles/AFP/Getty Images

Related posts:

  1. Cameron, leadership and the European Union
  2. Having a strong Labour team in the European Parliament matters for Britain
  3. Let’s focus on the issues in the European elections
  4. The Conservatives’ new friends in Europe
  5. A new majority in the European Parliament?

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →