Decommissioning cluster bombs is barking mad

July 2, 2009 3:34 pm

ClusterBy Dan McCurry

So Gordon Brown is serious that cluster bombs will be decommissioned. Is he barking mad? It seems that the reason for wasting munitions in this way is that cluster bombs can blow up; surely that’s the point of bombs. When I was a child growing up in the east end in the 1970s we were forever being evacuated because an unexploded WW2 bomb had been found. These days there isn’t a patch of the east end that hasn’t had luxury flats built on it, but back then our favourite playground was derelict houses from the bomb damage of the blitz decades earlier. To find the street cordoned off due to an unexploded bomb was a fairly routine occurrence. Why are cluster bombs any different from any other bomb? The fact that some bombs don’t go off is not unique to cluster bombs, it’s a problem with all bombs, so why don’t we just ban bombs?

The whole point of cluster bombs is that they are dropped in a package and disperse into a number of small munitions shortly before hitting the ground. This is useful for tearing up air-strips and roads. If we ban them we have to revert to dropping huge bombs that are likely to cause collateral damage, i.e. kill people who are not the target.

The campaign to end cluster bombs compared them to landmines, but there is no comparison at all. Landmines are put in the ground with the intention of not exploding. This is morally unacceptable. Cluster bombs are dropped with the intention of doing their job, exploding, this is completely different.

What distinction is being made here? Why not ban bullets? Or better, let’s ban bullets fired from machine guns but not those that are fired from rifles.

What distinction is being made here? I have no idea, but it’s the same logic that led Gordon to order that cluster bomb munitions be destroyed.

We’re losing people in Afghanistan due to a lack of boots, yet we’re pouring resources into destroying munitions for no logical reason whatsoever other than the fact that someone said they’re like landmines; that some of them don’t go off. If we have a technical problem, let’s fix the technical problem, not destroy resources just for the sake of it.

No related posts.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →
  • News NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    There’s some devastating YouGov polling on NHS “reform” for Cameron to digest today. Firstly, the public are firmly against his reforms. Almost half (48%) of the public oppose the reforms, compared to just 18% who back them. But it’s not just the broad idea of the reforms that the public oppose – it’s the specifics. On the question of whether increasing competition in the NHS will improve health services (something which Labour were not against in principle in office), the [...]

    Read more →