It’s time to embed pre-nuptials into our marriage law

July 6, 2009 12:13 pm

RingsBy John Cowan

Recently a friend of mine went through a painful and costly divorce. This caused me to think about the need for an urgent update of marriage law in England and Wales.

It’s a strange predicament when in business a partnership can contain clauses to allow partners to go separate ways, yet that most important act of union – marriage – does not allow parties to plan for the end of the partnership.

With divorce rates now at 11.9 per 1,000 marriages and increasing numbers of young people like myself opting for a less structured relationship model, now would be a good time to put before Parliament a Marriage Law Reform Bill. Such a bill could address issues that reflect the way modern families live and could tackle some of the strange situations in current UK marriage law. Because when institutions do not move with the times they become irrelevant.

So what should be changed and what impact might those changes have?

One would be compulsory pre-nuptial agreements. These might benefit the health security of the parties involved, as – should the relationship fail – they would not have to go through the whole circus of the courts to gain a divorce: witness, for example, the case of McCartney vs McCartney.

Society would also be better, as those individuals who seek to economically gain from relationships would not seek those relationships without due care, leading to greater confidence in the institution of marriage.

This union of economic and emotional bonds would enable a healthier environment in which childcare and other household tasks could be shared in a manner which suited all parties involved.

Related posts:

  1. It’s time to phase out faith schools

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →
  • News NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    There’s some devastating YouGov polling on NHS “reform” for Cameron to digest today. Firstly, the public are firmly against his reforms. Almost half (48%) of the public oppose the reforms, compared to just 18% who back them. But it’s not just the broad idea of the reforms that the public oppose – it’s the specifics. On the question of whether increasing competition in the NHS will improve health services (something which Labour were not against in principle in office), the [...]

    Read more →