LGBT refugees will be marching free from fear this weekend

July 3, 2009 3:03 pm

UnionBy Phil Woolas MP

The Labour Government is committed to providing protection for individuals found to be genuinely in need, in accordance with our commitments under international law – and we are proud to do so.

Under the 1951 UN Convention, a refugee is a person who has, amongst other things, a well founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion. Individuals who share a particular sexual orientation may be regarded as members of a particular social group depending on their circumstances. If they are considered to be a particular social group then a claimant who is at real risk for reason of membership of that group will fall within the Refugee Convention and will be granted asylum. If a claimant is at risk but not for reason of membership of a particular social group or other Refugee Convention reason, they may qualify for Humanitarian Protection.

We believe the right approach is to consider the protection needs of individuals on an individual basis. As with all asylum claims, there cannot be a presumption that every asylum seeker who presents themselves as being of a particular sexuality or nationality, regardless of their particular circumstances, should automatically be afforded the protection of being allowed to remain in the UK. Each asylum application is considered on a case by case basis in the light of its own facts and the situation in the country of origin.

Case owners dealing with asylum applications receive comprehensive training to ensure our obligations under the 1951 Convention are fully realised and receive instruction to do so sensitively, which includes consideration of applications where a claim is based on fear of persecution in their own country because they are a lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender person. There are also clear instructions to all immigration and asylum staff, that homophobic and transphobic persecution are legitimate grounds for granting asylum.

Country information is one of the most important parts in assessing an asylum claim. Case-owners have access to accurate, objective, sourced and up-to-date information on asylum seekers’ countries of origin, compiled from a wide range of reliable external information sources including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), human rights organisations, inter-governmental organisations, NGOs, news media and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. It does not contain any Home Office policy or opinion.

From time to time we are accused of expecting gay men and lesbians to be discreet, effectively to suppress their sexuality in order to avoid persecution. This is not an accurate representation. The Court of Appeal has found, in line with our policy that whether a gay claimant can reasonably be expected to tolerate behaving discreetly is something that must be considered on the individual merits of the case. All relevant factors must be taken into account including the person’s previous behaviour, the social norms and religious beliefs of their country of origin, and the fact that a degree of discretion can be required in all sexual relationships, heterosexual as well as homosexual. It is not our policy to require gay men or lesbians to be discreet about their sexuality.

There will be many genuine refugees marching as part of London Pride who have been granted asylum by the Government on the grounds of their sexual orientation – I am pleased to say that they are free from the fear of persecution and can enjoy the LGBT rights that Labour has introduced in the last 10 years.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →