Response to Iain Dale – The Pride Political Debate

July 3, 2009 6:08 pm

By Ben Bradshaw MP

I like Iain Dale, but I’m afraid he has got it wrong this time and at the same time has exposed one of the problems of blogging.

In his open letter to me and Chris Bryant MP, he bases his assertions on a BBC article which focused on one or two things that Chris and I said – from a two hour debate, at which I don’t think Iain was present.

In fact the Pride Political Debate, held to launch Pride celebrations in London, was a good-natured affair in which Chris and I debated with the Conservatives Nick Boles and Nick Herbert MP, and with Stephen Williams MP of the Liberal Democrats.

In Iain’s open letter, he comments that “We should try to find common cause rather than constantly to seek cheap political advantage”. I understand why the Tories would want to remove the politics from the debate, since their politics have not exactly measured up to the equality agenda recently or in the further past. As a Labour Minister I am proud to explain and communicate Labour’s policies and to show that Labour has a strong track record of achievement in ending discrimination.

During the debate, I recognised and welcomed moves from some Conservative Party members such as John Bercow to drag their party into the 21st Century and sign up to the equalities agenda, but warm words from some of the more progressive Tories can’t hide the poor record of many Conservative MPs and activists.

I also welcomed David Cameron’s recent change of language on equality and expressed a hope that the day will come soon when we do not have to debate this at all.

In turn, Nick Boles and Nick Herbert MP made staunch defences of their party, acknowledged their mistakes and talked about their advances, and were very gracious in their praise for what the Labour Government has achieved.

However, I commented that “there is still a deep strain of homophobia that still exists on the Tory benches”. I do believe that many Tory backbenchers remain unreconstructed, as even a cursory glance at their voting and Hansard records will confirm.

The Tory reaction to the debate, seeking to shout loudly in order to stifle discussion about their current stance on equality and gay rights, shows they still aren’t in the right place on this and have missed the point yet again.

David Cameron has apologised for his support of Section 28, but the argument has moved on.

Why are the Conservatives rejecting important equality legislation for LGBT people in the shape of the Equality Bill?

Why did Cameron and his frontbenchers oppose fertility rights for lesbians?

Why are they, right now, opposing laws to prevent incitement to homophobic hatred?

And why are they forming alliances with far-right, nasty homophobic parties in Europe and why aren’t gay Tories like Iain speaking out about this?

Despite some Tories’ slightly hysterical reaction, they cannot deny that over the years and even up to the present day they have voted against nearly all of the equality legislation that this Labour Government has introduced. Although the mood music has changed from Cameron, I’m afraid I remain to be convinced that the Tory backbenches have really changed.

Related posts:

  1. Iain Dale is not racist, but…
  2. The Iain Dale interview
  3. Yes. I am posting on Iain Dale again. He MUST now apologise
  4. Iain Dale should be ashamed of himself
  5. Iain Dale is worried he is being seen as a racist – it is up to him to clear his name

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Europe Ed Miliband should campaign for François Hollande

    Ed Miliband should campaign for François Hollande

    The Presidential election in France to be held on 22 April with a further round on 5 May, if necessary, matters hugely to the rest of Europe. Were Francois Hollande to win, there would be one significant voice at the top table in Europe opposed to the current centre-right imposition of continent-wide austerity as the sole solution to the economic crisis. France would provide an alternative policy, and a humane one to boot, which is lacking at present. Chancellor Merkel [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron’s cleaner plan leaves out the 99%

    Cameron’s cleaner plan leaves out the 99%

    Poor Dave. Everything’s going wrong and he just doesn’t have a clue what to do, does he? He’s sitting on an economic mess that is getting worse by the day. None of the plans seem to be quite working as they’d hoped. Incredibly, Gideon’s made-up economic model “Expansionary Fiscal Contraction” (We’ll call it “Cutting for Growth” shall we?) isn’t working out so well. Unemployment is rising! Inflation is still high! Growth is shrinking faster than Michael Gove’s grip on reality! [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Lansley and me…

    Lansley and me…

    There’s been quite a lot of Andrew Lansley in the press lately – mostly because he’s been making a terrible mess of NHS “reform”. It seems that no-one else can think of anything good to say about his reforms, especially the Prime Minister whose best riposte so far has been something along the lines of “Errrm, there’s a doctor in Doncaster who likes them…so there.” Enlightening, I’m sure. Now he’s been given the magical vote of confidence from Cameron – [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Elected City Mayors are an opportunity for Labour – if the party takes a positive approach

    Elected City Mayors are an opportunity for Labour – if the party takes a positive approach

    Labour run Liverpool Council voted this week to go straight to the election in May for a directly elected mayor, bypassing the referendum. This is significant. Not only does this open up the opportunity for Labour to gain more powers in the City, but it also sets the tone for other cities facing referendums in May. At present, Labour currently has four directly elected mayors; Hackney, Lewisham, Newham and Leicester. But many would argue that there should be more. Labour [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Why the Left should beware Salmond-onomics

    Why the Left should beware Salmond-onomics

    Following statements in both Westminster and Holyrood on the forthcoming referendum on separation, the debate on Scotland’s economic future has now been fully engaged. At stake in the referendum will be the nature of the new Scotland – either a low corporate tax, more oil and gas dependent economy on the SNP’s model, or a Scotland prepared to join the new agenda being advanced by the European left on reducing income inequality, and securing long-term investment in manufacturing and other [...]

    Read more →