The politics of envy and the hypocrisy of the right

July 13, 2009 12:33 pm

EnvyThe Duncan Weldon Economics Matters column

The ‘Politics of Envy’ is a phrase much used by the right. Whenever the left suggest raising taxes on top earners this is what we hear. Any attempt at a rational debate on the issues, any attempt to make an argument based on the principle of people ‘paying their fair share’ or any claim that equality is a social good is met with this simple rebuke.

So it is a little strange to see the right in Britain as a whole engaging in what can only be described as the ‘Politics of Envy’. How else can we categorise the ‘debate’ over public sector pay and pensions?

As I understand it, the argument runs as follows: there is one group of workers who (it is claimed) earn more than the others and have more secure pensions. Therefore this group should have their pay and pensions cut.

Sometimes the argument is phrased in terms of ‘fairness’ – something the left has never been allowed to do. To talk of taxing someone more because they earn more is to be ‘envious’, but to talk of cutting someone’s wages if they earn more is not?

At other times it is couched in terms of ‘economic necessity’, but when the left argues that the higher taxes are needed or that equality is an economic as well as a social good, these arguments are not accepted. What do the Tories et al actually think they will achieve by cutting public sector wages – other than less spending, a smaller tax take and a slower recovery? What will those things do to the public finances?

My favourite line the right have used in recent weeks is to claim that public sector workers only have better pay and pensions as they are unionised. Good. Maybe if private sector workers unionised to the same extent they could enjoy similar benefits. Is the right’s position seriously that it wants ‘fairness’ by leveling down? That it wants to pull everyone down to the lowest common denominator in the name of justice? Seriously? Because I seem to remember they are usually against that sort of thing.

There is a strong economic case against cutting public spending at this point in the economic cycle. We are not out of the economic woods yet and any cuts now, as demand drained from the economy, could push us back down into a ‘double dip’ recession.

But let’s leave aside the straight factual case for the moment (even though I believe it can be won on its merits). I believe the time has come to throw the right’s argument straight back at them. They are engaging in the Politics of Envy.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →