The unfinished battle for LGBT equality

July 5, 2009 10:19 am

BridesBy Peter Tatchell of OutRage!

In less than decade, the government has legislated astonishing, huge improvements in LGBT human rights, such as equalising the age of consent, introducing civil partnerships, repealing Section 28, outlawing homophobic discrimination and allowing same-sex couples to adopt children.

These stunning reforms have been won in an amazingly short period of time. Centuries of homophobic laws have been wiped from the statute books since 1999. This would have never happened if the Tories had remained in power. The Labour government – and pro-LGBT MPs from all parties – deserve our praise and gratitude.

But these progressive changes are no excuse for the government’s apparent endorsement of several remaining pockets of homophobic discrimination. The battle for equal rights is not yet won.

The current Equality Bill protects against harassment, except on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. The government and the National Blood Service have a blanket lifetime ban on blood donations from any man who has ever had oral or anal sex with another man – even once, 50 years ago and even if they test HIV-negative.

Same-sex marriage is still illegal. Civil partnerships are not equality. Separate laws are not equal laws. Even if, like me, you are critical of the institution of marriage, to ban LGBT couples from getting married is an act of bare-faced homophobic discrimination. It is a system of sexual apartheid. We now have a situation where lesbians and gays are banned from civil marriage (homophobia) and straights are banned from civil partnerships (heterophobia). This exclusionist two-tiered system of partnership law is not equality. It perpetuates and extends discrimination. Marriage is the gold standard. Civil partnerships are second best.

The Home Office is refusing asylum to LGBT refugees who have been jailed, tortured and raped in countries like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Nigeria, Jamaica, Iran, Algeria, Zimbabwe and Uganda. It says they won’t be at risk of arrest and murder if they go back home, change their names, hide their sexuality and behave ‘with discretion’. Accordingly, it is ordering the deportation of LGBT refugees, despite the danger they could be imprisoned or killed on return to their home countries.

The police and the Crown Prosecution Service permit record stores and radio stations to promote CDs by homophobic reggae singers who openly advocate the murder of queers. The Home Secretary gives these singers visa and work permits. Government ministers would never tolerate similar ‘murder music’ against Jewish or black people. Why aren’t LGBT people entitled to the same legal protection?

Section 28 may have been repealed, but many schools are failing to challenge homophobic and transphobic bullying. This bullying affects both LGBT pupils and LGBT staff. For many of them, school is not a safe space. Verbal or physical abuse is experienced by around two-thirds of LGBT school kids. LGBT teachers are also often subjected to taunts, ridicule and threats by homophobic pupils. They do not always get support and back-up from other teaching staff.

Unlike racism, homophobia is still frequently tolerated in the classroom and playground. “Gay” has become a commonplace taunt. Most schools don’t bother to discipline offenders.

To its credit, the government says that the education system should challenge all forms of prejudice, to ensure that schools are inclusive, safe environments for youngsters and teachers from all backgrounds. But then it contradicted this commitment by recently exempting faith schools from its curriculum guidelines; allowing them to continue to teach sex and relationship education in accordance with their anti-gay religious values.

The reality is that too few schools of any kind impart an understanding of LGBT people and issues. The needs and welfare of LGBT pupils are rarely addressed in sex education and HIV prevention lessons. Safer sex information often ignores the specific risks faced by LGBT young people. It invariably focuses on heterosexual relationships, to the neglect of same-sex ones.

These are a few issues where the government could have overturned homophobia, but has instead chosen to maintain discrimination. The government says it is committed to LGBT equality, but on some issues it has failed to deliver.

What can you do? Protest to your MP and to the Prime Minister. Ask for their support to remedy these injustices. Together, we can and will overcome these final barriers to LGBT equality.

For more information about Peter Tatchell’s human rights campaigns visit www.petertatchell.net.

Related posts:

  1. LGBT rights are diminished if they are merely treated as brand decontamination – they must be part of our broader argument for equality
  2. No, Ms James, the LGBT community has no duty to vote Conservative
  3. Celebrating Gay Pride with LGBT Labour
  4. LGBT refugees will be marching free from fear this weekend
  5. Celebrating Pride on LabourList

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →