16,000 vote in Tory open primary

August 4, 2009 2:22 pm

By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

UPDATE: In a response on Twitter, David Lammy MP has said it’s “definite” that Labour should adopt open primaries across the board. View David’s full thoughts here.

UPDATE: Andrew Sparrow has some choice quotes on the primary in Totnes from local Conservatives, including:

“The Lib Dems have got the candidate they wanted.”

A record 16,000 voters – about 25% of the electorate – have selected Sarah Woolaston as the new Conservative Party parliamentary candidate for Totnes in the country’s first open primary experiment.

As we’ve said on these pages before, this is a bold move.

Anthony Painter says on his blog that he is “absolutely staggered and impressed” by the turnout, while Michael Crick of Newsnight said yesterday that any turnout of 15% or more would enable the Tories to claim this was a “successful exercise, even if it has cost them £4 a vote, or more.”

I was initially sceptical about primaries in this country, and espcially about how they would be funded. But I’ve come round to the view that they are something the Labour party should seriously consider adopting – and the relative enthusiasm for the process in Totnes for a first time experiment should mean the party takes another look.

Although we wait to see the impact this may have on the general election result in Totnes, I suspect – with a majority of nearly 2,000 to defend and a relationship built up with constituents through primary campaigning – Sarah Woollaston will be successful.

Related posts:

  1. Is it time for Labour to adopt open primaries across the board?
  2. Vote for freedom. Vote for fairness. Vote for equality. Vote.
  3. Where does the Tory vote against welfare reform leave Cameron’s couples policy?
  4. How do we open up admissions to faith schools?
  5. Open Primaries? No thanks

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →
  • News NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    There’s some devastating YouGov polling on NHS “reform” for Cameron to digest today. Firstly, the public are firmly against his reforms. Almost half (48%) of the public oppose the reforms, compared to just 18% who back them. But it’s not just the broad idea of the reforms that the public oppose – it’s the specifics. On the question of whether increasing competition in the NHS will improve health services (something which Labour were not against in principle in office), the [...]

    Read more →