PPC Profile: Tom Miller

August 11, 2009 8:08 am

Tom MillerFull Name: Tom Miller

Age: 23

From: Woking. Mostly.

PPC for: Woking. Completely.

Selection Result:
Got over 3/4 of the vote in the final round of counting, but I shan’t go into details. It’s only been a short while since the initial selection. Our old PPC stepped down to contest Erith, so we had to run a selection at the same time as local elections.

Member of the Labour Party since
:
Oooh, some time around 2003/04. Not that it was Iraq that attracted me, I joined at what I regard as the lowest ever point in Labour’s history in government, in that respect. They ask this question in selections over and over again, by the way, and I can never remember.

CV:
Well, I have a degree in Law with Politics. I preferred the law, but could never afford to take it any further. Without getting too extensive, bearing my age in mind, I’ve spent most of my time working in the service sector, restaurants and bars. I have also briefly been an organiser and worked for some planning public affairs people, and of course spent a few months at LabourList before the McBride affair rinsed us out of cash. Good to see that you’ve managed to run it and rebuild it without receiving any potentially libelous emails. It shouldn’t be that difficult really!

I was inspired to go into politics because:
There is whole world in need of change. Our neighborhoods need it too. I could wheel out a million quotes, but probably the best is from Robert F. Kennedy: “I believe that while there is plenty, poverty is evil”.

My main policy interests are:
Well, I suppose policy priorities change with time. At the moment I would support the line ‘jobs, jobs, jobs’. There are things to be done in the world, which all need labour power, but we have rising unemployment and poverty, as well as lots of concentrated wealth. This whole situation is patently absurd.

In terms of interests, I would say that my main policy interests are probably public transport, public service reform, and the environment, which I suppose is a bigger priority for our generation than for a decent sized chunk of Labour politicians before us.

Those are my interests, but my actual immediate priorities are a bit different. For obvious reasons at the moment I’m interested almost exclusively in creating and saving decent jobs, and getting people spending money.

I believe in balanced budgets, but I think the best way to do that is to make sure we come out of recession without having completely devastated our potential to recover. Increased investment and borrowing is needed, because it’s a slow rise we need, in other words.

Three things I think should be in the next Labour manifesto are:
1 – Restructure. Break up and permanently mutualise state banks for stability, and to avoid monopoly, split investment functions as far as possible from retail banking, and have trade union and small shareholder reps sit on company boards where applicable. Maybe not the most populist one, this!

2 – Bring in a local living wage system, to be set by local authorities based on a set of guidelines built around prices…basically, peg the bottom rate of pay to inflation.

3 – I’m stuck between ‘promise a representative voting system’ and ‘regularise illegal immigrants so they work and pay for what they use’. Sorry, cheated.

I think people should vote for me because:
If they don’t I can’t win? But seriously, I think Woking deserves better than the Conservatives. It never gets it. And ecumenical as I am, I am in this party for a reason; despite my departing from the ‘third way’, and general social democracy, I see little alternative. Labour is the only vehicle for progressive politics as things stand. The Lib Dems will never be a feasible government, or have any sense of political responsibility. They have no constituency.

I was never on the panel you need to be on to be an MP until the local vacancy unexpectedly arose when the PPC stepped down. I grew through my adolescence in this area, and I care about the people who live in it, particularly (but not only) in those pockets of tough areas that our local political establishment chooses to completely ignore and deny.

And I have decent policies.

I appreciate that I am (very) young, but the commons is full of rose-cheeked guffawing old men, and few of them know how to make a slippery nipple, or what it feels like to shower stale fag ash out of your hair. There is lots of public service, but very little service sector. In New Zealand, Labour put Jacinda Ardern near the top of their list. Why don’t we have any young parliamentarians?

AOB:
You should all know that Derek Draper subsists almost entirely on doughnuts. Eat enough of them and you’re sure to pull someone from GMTV!

Comments are closed

Latest

  • News More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    Ed Miliband is addressing Google’s Bug Tent tomorrow, and is expected to attack them over tax avoidance. So the slick Downing Street operation presumably want to get out ahead of that, right? Not quite. Here’s a selection of the headlines from today’s papers: ‘Stop moralising about tax avoidance, PM told’ – Guardian p.23 ‘Tougher tax rules would cost jobs, minister warns’ – Financial Times p.3 ‘Cameron avoids showdown over Google tax row’ – Times p.15 ‘No taxing questions as PM [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →