A blueprint for a High Pay Commission

September 16, 2009 6:31 pm

By Joe Cox

A year on from the collapse of Lehman Brothers and it appears little has been learned. Whilst the government boldly led a rescue of the failed private banking system the fundamental questions about the effects of high pay on our economy and society remain unanswered.

In our new online publication we argue that there is a compelling case for examining the effects of high pay on our economy and society through a High Pay Commission. The five key reasons being:

1: The link between excessive pay and the economic crisis is now widely acknowledged. According to the House of Commons Treasury Committee’s report Banking Crisis: reforming corporate governance and pay in the City, “the ‘bonus culture’ in the City of London, particularly amongst those involved in trading activities in investment banks, contributed to excessive risk-taking and short-termism and thereby played a contributory role in the banking crisis”. Despite this there has been no major reforms to rein in or even scrutinise excessive pay.

2: A major justification for high pay is that it is the result of high performance. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that the link between pay and performance at the top is unproven. In 2008 FTSE 100 chief executives saw their basic salaries increase by a massive 10% despite plummeting profits and dividends. We have witnessed the biggest economic downturn in our lifetime but the structure that keeps the well-paid insulated from economic failure remains.

3: The gains from higher productivity have been increasingly siphoned off by the super rich since the 1980s. The share of GDP going to profits has continued to rise while at the same time there has been a decline in the share allocated to wages. The reduction of the relative share of labour in national income has led to a reduction in aggregate demand. In short, if profits and output rise faster than wages, who will buy the output? Demand was kept up in the short term by increasing the supply of credit and keeping interest rates low, but this is not a sustainable economic model.

4: Due to the huge collapse of the financial system, large swathes of the banking system are now in public ownership. Despite this, the culture of high pay has been reinforced in the publicly owned banks. Stephen Hester, CEO at the Royal Bank of Scotland, has a potential salary package of £9.6 million and these £1 million plus remuneration packages are not confined to the chief executive. This raises very real questions about taxpayer value and democracy. When such huge pay packages are awarded should there not be transparency?

5: There is a clear public interest and support in controlling excessive salaries. Indeed polling commissioned by Compass shows that 63% support establishing a High Pay Commission. 78% agree that the growing gap between rich and poor is bad for our society and 73% would support the government in imposing a new tax on all bonuses above £10,000 a year.

This is an issue not just of sound economics but of democratic principle. No one can be beyond restraint if their actions harm others.

Download the Compass Blueprint for a High Pay Commission here.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →