A burning incentive – would any PM have done any different?

September 9, 2009 2:50 pm

Blair LibyaBy Tracey Cheetham

In 2007, BP in conjunction with it’s ‘Libyan partner’ the Libyan Investment Corporation, signed an agreement with the National Oil Company of Libya. According to their Chief Executive Tony Hayward, it was BP’s “single biggest exploration commitment“. Mr Hayward and NOC Chairman Shokri Ghanem, sealed the deal in the presence of British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Details of the agreement were explained by BP in a press release:

“BP and the LIC will explore around 54,000 square kilometres of the onshore Ghadames and offshore frontier Sirt basins, equivalent to more than ten of BP’s operated deepwater blocks in Angola. During this exploration and appraisal phase, BP will acquire 5,500km of 2D seismic and 30,000km2 of 3D seismic and will drill 17 exploration wells.”

A big commitment – BP had been absent from the Libyan Oil Industry for over 30 years. There had been much negotiation and promises of BP spending 50 million dollars on education and training projects for Libyan professionals during exploration and appraisal and a further 50 million dolars when production began.

Map LibyaIt is fair to assume that there was fierce competition, as Libya was not only opening the doors of its lucrative oil industry to BP, but to other international oil companies, having seen international relations warming since sanctions were lifted in 2004.

However, since the deals were forged, there have been numerous logistical and bureaucratic problems preventing BP from bringing in the necessary equipment to fulfil the contracts; Libya has delayed permits and prevented completion of the required official paperwork.

In July, Gordon Brown held talks with Colonel Gaddafi during the G8 conference. They discussed the fate of the convicted Lockerbie bomber Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi and Gaddafi ‘urged’ Brown to allow his sentence to be served out in Libya, due to his terminal illness. Brown called Libya a “critical partner” due to its role as an oil producer and the leaders agreed on the need for better consumer and producer dialogue over oil.

It has been suggested that the release of al-Megrahi would demonstrate the UK’s commitment to Libya and help to eliminate the red-tape being used to delay the current BP deal. The deal is worth around 900 million dollars and has the potential for knock-on effects across the energy industry in the UK and Europe, so the motivation to comply with Gaddafi’s request is clear.

More so, when it is considered that in recent months, Tripoli has been holding negotiations for not only oil and gas but also arms deals and not only with the UK but also with Russia. (Given the history, it is surprising to discover that Libya is not on the list of countries that British Arms Companies are banned from exporting to.)

Then consider that Libya holds the largest stock of oil reserves in Africa, at 42 billion barrels and has enormous potential for gas. With the current position regarding Russian gas exports and the reliance on imports for 40% of the UK’s needs, an alternative source would prove very useful and add vital security to the UK energy market.

In 2008, Vladimir Putin travelled to Tripoli. He is keen to obtain access to Libyan resources and further compound his country’s position as the world’s largest producer of gas. He also wishes to forge long-term arms deals and site a Russian Naval base on Libyan soil. This is concerning for Europe, given the additional leverage this would give Russia over gas supplies across the continent. The US would also be unhappy should such a partnership be achieved.

So, despite the initial denials, is it really a surprise that al-Megrahi was released, when the competition between Libya’s courtiers is considered.

It would be naive to believe that with Blair being present for the birth of the BP/NOC deal, that Brown would not be playing a God-fatherly role and doing what he could to preserve and protect it. So while the Tories and the anti-Brown/Labour bandwagon fire up their outrage at the release, I have to say that I doubt any Prime Minister in this position would do any different.

This post was first published at Tracey’s blog, My Two Penneth.

No related posts.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →