A Co-operative solution to meeting affordable housing needs

September 11, 2009 4:43 pm

Coop HousingBy David Rodgers

The global financial crisis has had a devastating impact on the housing market, the availability of mortgages and the supply of affordable housing. How we meet the demand for affordable homes and prevent a further socially and economically damaging spiral of house price inflation in future years, fuelled by an acute shortage of housing supply, is a key issue of social justice. If we are to meet this challenge we need to be innovative and creative in finding new ways of building affordable homes and new sources of finance to fund them.

‘Mutual Home Ownership’ is a new form of housing tenure devised by the Co-operative Movement that has a unique capacity to meet the affordable housing delivery and funding challenges we face in the post-financial-crisis world. As set out in the recent publication New Foundations: Unlocking the Potential for Affordable Homes, it is designed to fill the growing gap between affordable rented housing and the open housing market, specifically (but not exclusively) for households on average earnings who can service part of the cost of providing their home but who cannot afford the full costs by buying on the open market.

Mutual Home Ownership is a different way of owning a stake in a home, but the way it works is fundamentally quite simple. The land on which the homes are built is owned by a Community Land Trust (CLT), which takes the land out of the market and holds it in perpetuity as a community-owned asset. The CLT grants a Mutual Home Ownership Society (MHOS) the right to build on the land and use it for Mutual Home Ownership. This immediately makes the homes more affordable.

The cost of building the homes is met by a mix of 10%t deposits from resident members of the MHOS and a 90% corporate mortgage loan. Rather than owning a percentage share of a particular house or flat funded by a personal mortgage, resident members of the mutual own equity shares in the value of the portfolio of property owned by the mutual. The mutual’s property portfolio is divided up into equity shares, each with a value of £1,000 on the date the project is completed and the long-term corporate investment needed to fund it is drawn down.

To ensure affordability across the range of incomes within a community, the number of equity shares purchased and funded through rental payments is geared to 35% of a household’s net income. The more a resident earns, the more equity shares they own and fund, and the more they pay in a monthly rental to the mutual. As their income rises they are expected to fund more equity shares.

When residents wish to leave the mutual, they are entitled to take the net capital value (if any) of their equity shares with them. This net capital value is calculated in accordance with a valuation formula in the member’s occupancy agreement (lease).

There are many advantages in treating equity investment in housing in this way, the details of which are set out in New Foundations.

However, the big advantage of Mutual Home Ownership is that because corporate finance is required for a long term investment, not for short term mortgages to individuals, it can be structured to be an attractive investment for pension funds and other long-term investors. By drawing in this new source of finance, more affordable homes can be built in partnership with local communities.

It is time for the Labour Government to embrace this new form of co-operative housing to help provide more affordable homes for those who need them.

New Foundations: Unlocking the Potential for Affordable Homes, published by the Co-operative Party on 27 January 2009, can be downloaded free as a PFD file from the Co-operative Party’s website at www.party.coop.

Related posts:

  1. Community building and crime beating: making the case for co-operative housing
  2. Co-ownership: A new approach to housing
  3. Our values or theirs? How the Tory mask is slipping on housing policy
  4. Why Labour must start thinking differently about housing in Wales and recapture the confidence to be radical
  5. Tory twists and turns on knocking down housing

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →