Proposal #1: Create a National Care Service offering a minimum standard of long term care for all older people

September 16, 2009 11:36 am

Social CareBy Stephen Burke

New Ideas for a Renewed Movement.

Fairer funding of care for Britain’s ageing population is one of the biggest unmet social and economic challenges to be resolved by the Labour government. The forthcoming manifesto provides a chance to ensure that older people get the care they want and need through a radical change in the way care is funded.

We are living longer, with 1.3 million people now aged 85 and over. In the next twenty years the number of people over 85 will double, raising major questions about how we provide and fund care and support for older people and their carers.

The Government has acknowledged this with a green paper on funding care in England published in July. The green paper presents some long-term proposals to pay for the better care older people and their carers urgently need, particularly for the growing number of older people with dementia, disabilities and long-term conditions.

With our ageing population and the increasing expectations of baby boomers, the current care system simply isn’t fit for the future. Older people and their families have for too long settled for inadequate, under-funded care. Their expectations of the care system have been and remain low, informed by an experience which, all too often, can be even worse. But as the debate about personalisation and choice in health and social care takes off and as new generations approach retirement, those expectations are changing.

With the Government preparing for the biggest overhaul of the system for a generation, it is time to set our sights higher. Now is the time for an ambitious vision for the reform of social care. Ambition is also important because of past failures to resolve these issues such as the Royal Commission a decade ago, and because of the scale of the problem not just in terms of funding but in developing flexible care and support that reflect the needs and wants of British society in the 21st century.

Bold proposals in the ‘Shaping the Future of Care Together’ green paper to end the postcode lottery in care and make paying for care fairer for everybody therefore have to be welcomed. The proposals meet many of Counsel and Care‘s tests for a new system which must be simpler, fairer, consistent, transparent and flexible, meeting the needs of older people all over the country.

Creating a national care service is particularly ambitious and could put care on a par with the NHS. Making care a universal service that everyone has a stake in and everyone benefits from would certainly make a big difference. The proposal for a national care service with a universal entitlement to care and a national assessment and portability seeks to end the postcode lottery. People want to know what care will be available wherever they live and how much it will cost them.

What can’t be ducked though is that better care will cost us all more. So we need to find new ways to pay for the growing bill. But any new funding system must be fairer, simpler and transparent for all.

The green paper rules out paying for care entirely from taxation or from individuals’ own resources. It sets out three options for the state and individuals to share the costs of care in partnership, with different levels of contribution by indviduals.

Of the three funding options, I support the ‘comprehensive’ option as being the simplest way to share the risks and costs of care. Under this option, everyone would get the care they need in return for a one-off contribution. What needs to be debated is how that contribution could be made in a way that is fair. I have argued for some time that a ‘care duty’ on people’s estates would be a better way to pay for care – we already have a collection mechanism and the level of payment could reflect an individual’s wealth, rather than everyone being required to pay the same lump-sum.

How we pay for care is an issue that touches every family in the country. We simply can’t do nothing and ignore the needs of this and future generations of older people.

Stephen Burke is Chief Executive of Counsel and Care, the national charity working with older people, their families and carers to get the best care and support. www.counselandcare.org.uk.

Related posts:

  1. Ten real things which could be achieved for older people in the next ten months
  2. A national recycling service for all
  3. Today’s social care green paper is overdue – now Labour has to be more decisive on funding
  4. Why the social care green paper matters
  5. It’s becoming more difficult to see how Cameron and his sub-standard team could take the reins

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →