Proposal #2: Votes at 16

September 16, 2009 1:05 pm

Votes at 16By Wes Streeting / @wesstreeting

Imagine a country with a democratic deficit, where political elites are struggling to find ways of reversing a trend of declining voter turnout. Imagine that the same elites are simultaneously refusing to open the door to scores of citizens who are actually asking to vote. Sound crazy? Welcome to 21st century Britain.

Earlier this year, the government’s Youth Citizenship Commission, of which I was part, ran a consultation to find out what young people thought about lowering the voting age to 16. A representative survey found that a clear majority of young people supported extending the franchise. The work of the same commission found that a whopping 82% of young people don’t trust politicians to make the right decisions for them and 72% don’t feel that they can influence government decisions.

Who can blame them? How many times have Labour canvassers been out on the doorstep and asked a 14, 15 or 16 year old how the local council can meet their needs, instead of simply asking if Mum or Dad’s home? Even at grassroots level, the Labour Party sends a message to young people across Britain that we don’t care about them because they can’t vote.

This is self-defeating for our progressive politics, when the quality of public services, safer neighbourhoods and tackling poverty matters just as much to young people as any other section of the population. On issues like climate change, the failure of global leaders to act will have a greater impact on the current generation of young people than those charged with making decisions that could make the difference.

Lowering the voting age to 16 is not a tool for increasing the proportion of voters turning out, but it is a way of giving young people who want the vote – who pay taxes, join the armed forces, get married, drive cars – an opportunity to exercise some influence over the political system that currently lets too many young people down.

The Labour Party as a whole now agrees. Only last year, Olivia Bailey led a determined and successful effort to secure the support of the National Policy Forum for lowering the voting age to 16. She did so by mobilising young people inside and outside the Labour movement to support her campaign and gained the overwhelming support of NPF members. Olivia’s campaign – and speech to the National Policy Forum – was cited by Ed Miliband, the man charged with drafting the next manifesto, at Party conference last autumn. The same conference endorsed the NPF’s recommendation and lowering the voting age to 16 is now a Labour Party policy.

Whether or not the commitment will be included in the next manifesto remains to be seen. Much will depend on whether the Party’s policy making process counts for me as much as the opposition of figures in the Cabinet, like Jack Straw. For the Labour Party, however, the inclusion of votes at 16 in the next manifesto is a litmus test as to how seriously the leadership take the youth movement of the Party.

Ed Miliband: we’re watching you.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →