Proposal #2: Votes at 16

September 16, 2009 1:05 pm

Votes at 16By Wes Streeting / @wesstreeting

Imagine a country with a democratic deficit, where political elites are struggling to find ways of reversing a trend of declining voter turnout. Imagine that the same elites are simultaneously refusing to open the door to scores of citizens who are actually asking to vote. Sound crazy? Welcome to 21st century Britain.

Earlier this year, the government’s Youth Citizenship Commission, of which I was part, ran a consultation to find out what young people thought about lowering the voting age to 16. A representative survey found that a clear majority of young people supported extending the franchise. The work of the same commission found that a whopping 82% of young people don’t trust politicians to make the right decisions for them and 72% don’t feel that they can influence government decisions.

Who can blame them? How many times have Labour canvassers been out on the doorstep and asked a 14, 15 or 16 year old how the local council can meet their needs, instead of simply asking if Mum or Dad’s home? Even at grassroots level, the Labour Party sends a message to young people across Britain that we don’t care about them because they can’t vote.

This is self-defeating for our progressive politics, when the quality of public services, safer neighbourhoods and tackling poverty matters just as much to young people as any other section of the population. On issues like climate change, the failure of global leaders to act will have a greater impact on the current generation of young people than those charged with making decisions that could make the difference.

Lowering the voting age to 16 is not a tool for increasing the proportion of voters turning out, but it is a way of giving young people who want the vote – who pay taxes, join the armed forces, get married, drive cars – an opportunity to exercise some influence over the political system that currently lets too many young people down.

The Labour Party as a whole now agrees. Only last year, Olivia Bailey led a determined and successful effort to secure the support of the National Policy Forum for lowering the voting age to 16. She did so by mobilising young people inside and outside the Labour movement to support her campaign and gained the overwhelming support of NPF members. Olivia’s campaign – and speech to the National Policy Forum – was cited by Ed Miliband, the man charged with drafting the next manifesto, at Party conference last autumn. The same conference endorsed the NPF’s recommendation and lowering the voting age to 16 is now a Labour Party policy.

Whether or not the commitment will be included in the next manifesto remains to be seen. Much will depend on whether the Party’s policy making process counts for me as much as the opposition of figures in the Cabinet, like Jack Straw. For the Labour Party, however, the inclusion of votes at 16 in the next manifesto is a litmus test as to how seriously the leadership take the youth movement of the Party.

Ed Miliband: we’re watching you.

Related posts:

  1. There’s a worrying disconnection between young people and politics – it’s time to act on Votes at 16
  2. As Israel counts its votes, what next for Palestinians?
  3. Are Labour losing women’s votes on public services?
  4. Proposal #1: Create a National Care Service offering a minimum standard of long term care for all older people

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Europe Video Chuka Umunna on what Britain can learn from Germany

    Chuka Umunna on what Britain can learn from Germany

    Read more →
  • Comment In Defence of Social Democracy

    In Defence of Social Democracy

    Firstly, I would like to thank David Miliband for taking seriously the arguments which were presented in my recent article in The Political Quarterly, ‘In Praise of Social Democracy’ co-authored with Roy Hattersley. Obviously we disagree over the recent past and the future of the Labour Party, but this should be a debate over principles and not personalities. What does David argue? The implication is that we are being intellectually complacent – lazy even – wishing to retreat into some [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The tragedy of Chris Huhne

    The tragedy of Chris Huhne

    It was inevitable that he had to go – in fairness, it had been coming for some time. The spectre of the court case hung over him, further tarnishing his credibility. Powerful friends and allies had already exhausted their capacity for patience with him. He surely knew the game was up. Today he was cast adrift. Now the courts must decide whether he is guilty (and therefore banished from public life) or innocent (and perhaps, once again able to return [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Resignation calls after Tory Councillor’s “pudding bowl attack” on wife

    Resignation calls after Tory Councillor’s “pudding bowl attack” on wife

    According to local paper the Express and Star, a Dudley councillor is facing calls to resign after admitting assaulting his wife: “A councillor has admitted assault after throwing a pudding bowl at his wife’s head – sparking calls for him to resign. Tory councillor Paul Woodall’s wife Joanne was left with a one-inch cut to her forehead and blood pouring down her face, a court heard. Dudley Magistrates was told Woodall, 45, elected two years ago for Kingswinford North and [...]

    Read more →
  • News Caroline Flint on Ed Davey’s appointment

    Caroline Flint on Ed Davey’s appointment

    After Ed Davey was announced as Chris Huhne’s replacement in the cabinet today, Caroline Flint called on him to “stand up to vested interests in the energy industry”: “David Cameron promised this would be the “greenest Government ever”. But on his watch the Green Investment Bank has been delayed, thousands of jobs and businesses in the solar industry have been put at risk and the UK has fallen from third in the world for investment in green growth to thirteenth. [...]

    Read more →