Mr Cameron, your speech was hypocritical, hollow and dangerous

October 8, 2009 6:00 pm

By Rowenna Davis

Mr Cameron, you started your speech today saying you were a rather “uncomplicated” man. Your personal simplicity is perhaps the one part of your speech that I agreed with. Never have I been so proud of being on the left as when I was listening to you just now. Here are just a few reasons why your simplistic agenda fails to come up to scratch:

1) Life is more complicated than “Small Government Good, Big Government Bad.” The world has moved on from such dogmatic ideology. As Obama said, it’s not the size of the state that matters – it’s what works. If you’ve ever met anyone who’s just come out of prison, been long term unemployed or a young single mum you’ll know that simply withdrawing state support doesn’t work. To get people back into work, people need confidence, skills and training. These things are expensive. You can’t just stop investing in people and expect them to give something back. And in a recession, the state may need to pay to create jobs for people to go in to whilst the private sector gets itself back on its feet. Shrinking government now is bad economics.

2) You say that you want society to take the place of the state, but you don’t say how you are going to create this revolution. Just roll back the state and hope everyone picks up where it left off…? Compare your speech to Brown’s policy packed agenda and you don’t just seem like a novice – you look hollow.

3) A word about incentives. You claim there is a 96% “tax” on certain groups that go back into work. This twist of logic blows Orwell out of the water by counting past benefits as taxes. Sure, there is a work incentive problem, but there are two ways to solve that. The first is to increase working tax credits, as Labour has done, and the second is to cut benefits. Doing the second just plunges people already below the poverty line further down. “Incentive” in your dictionary, David, means pulling the plug on the poor. To dress this up as helping the vulnerable, a move which won you a standing ovation, is sickening.

4) You’re a hypocrite on the size of the state. If you think a surge in Afghanistan and an increase in prison building won’t build up this country’s debt, you really are simple. The only difference with spending it on jails and bombs is that it doesn’t reap back the benefits of reinvestment that spending on health and education would.

5) Absolute inequality did increase under Labour. That is undeniably grim. But do you know what, Labour slowed down that growth in inequality massively compared to Thatcher. Just read King’s new book – A Generation of Change, a Lifetime of Difference. It’s got all the facts you need.

6) You’re a hypocrite on benefits. The story you told about Viv Williams, who was forced onto incapacity against his will, is a sad one. But the Tories would perpetuate state enforced dependency in other ways. Theresa May told me this week that the party had no plans to lift the employment ban on asylum seekers, even if the Home Office fails to process their claims for years. Yours talk here doesn’t come from a brave commitment to genuine values; it comes from the worst kind of political pragmatism.

In short, Mr Cameron, you’re over simplistic agenda is hollow, hypocritical and dangerous. Please do us all a favour, and produce some policies that work, even if – heaven forbid! – they are a bit more complicated.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →