While our democracy burns, Cameron wants to fiddle

October 7, 2009 3:53 pm

Labour clears the way House LordsBy Julian Ware-Lane / @WareLane

2009 has seen the integrity of our Parliament damaged in a way that I have not seen before in all of my 49 years. The response from all major parties is that changes have to be made; it’s been acknowledged that there is a lack of accountability for many of those who grace the green and red leather benches.

The Conservative Party has been the enemy of real reform over the centuries, and they are not yet able to abandon this yoke. They are still in hock to vested interest, and so, despite the fanfare and foofaraw that has accompanied some of their announcements it is clear that nothing will really change if David Cameron gets the keys to Number Ten.

So far they have announced a reduction in the number of MPs, the cutting of ministerial salaries, and are trumping primaries (an exercise in self-promotion that delivers lots of publicity without affecting the cosy little club that is Parliament).

Now, it is reported that David Cameron is preparing to appoint a record number of peers if the Tories win. At a time when there is clamour for reform, and reform has been voted for by Parliament, Mr Cameron’s grand plan is to load the second chamber with cronies.

It is a century since real reform of the House of Lords became an issue, and slow progress has been the story since. We need an elected second chamber, not one that will nod through every Tory idea without a second thought.

With thanks to Unlock Democracy, here is a timeline of House of Lords reform:

1909
The House of Lords causes a national outrage by blocking the government’s “People’s Budget”.

1911
Parliament Act: Asserted the supremacy of the House of Commons by limiting the legislation-blocking powers of the House of Lords.

1949
Parliament Act: Further limited the power of the Lords by reducing the time that they could delay bills, from two years to one.

1945 – 1951
Salisbury Convention: Established the principle that the House of Lords will not oppose the second or third reading of any government legislation promised in its election manifesto.

1958
Life peerages Act: Increased the ability of the Prime Minister to change the composition of the House of Lords and considerably lessened the dominance of hereditary ‘part-time’ peers.

1963
Peerage Act: Allowed the disclaiming of peerages, and permitted female and Scottish hereditary peers to sit in the House of Lords.

1999
House of Lords Act: Removed right of hereditary peers to sit in House of Lords. However, 92 hereditary peers were kept.

2007
The House of Commons vote overwhelmingly in support of either a 100% or 80% elected House of Lords.

Progress requires a progressive government – Gordon Brown announced further reform last week. But without a Labour Government the transformation of our democracy will be put on hold.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →