A good day for parents, for Labour and for Gordon

November 15, 2009 10:48 am

ChildcareBy Jessica Asato / @Jessica_Asato

The Sunday Times is reporting today that Gordon Brown has decided to change his mind on withdrawing the relief on childcare tax vouchers. Earlier this week on LabourList, I wrote about Progress’ campaign to ask Gordon to rethink this change because of our concerns that the move would force parents, particularly mothers, to quit work to cover the childcare gap which it would create. It didn’t look like our argument was gaining much traction within Government, though we were told that Downing Street was in ‘listening mode’ which I guess is code for ‘things might change’. But when John McFall MP was put up against Sally Keeble MP on Newsnight on Thursday, the cribsheet defence was the same – the Government wants to take money from rich people and give it to poorer two-year olds, despite our evidence that 74% of the relief already went to basic rate taxpayers. So it was a real surprise to see today’s papers suggesting that Downing Street had really been listening after all. In the history of u-turns, it’s a pretty quick one and it shows the public, backbenchers and the Prime Minister in their best light.

It was the public who really made this happen of course. The childcare vouchers petition on the Downing Street website still remains the most popular and has reached over 81,000 signatures. Parents were out in force, particularly on MumsNet, where Gordon had his first taste on 16 October of the anger which was growing on this issue. It shows that the internet is perhaps beginning to have a more immediate impact on poor decision-making in government by forming the virtual march on Parliament without the months of preparation which is often needed for real marches to have an impact.

The testimonies of women for whom the relief on the vouchers was a lifeline to employment had a real impact on me. One woman wrote on the Facebook Group:

“our nursery fees are £800 a month for 3.5 days a week with no entitlement to working tax credit. I know it’s our choice to have a child but why take away our one tax concession – child care vouchers. Sick of being regarded as a high tax payer when we earn more than £25K…we have no disposible income after bills and don’t have the luxury of an expense account like MPs.”

It seemed deeply unfair that the Government was planning to withdraw the one thing, which of course it had itself introduced amidst much fanfare in 2005, which gave working parents financial help with childcare. These people were certainly not rich, but felt they had made a conscious effort to get into, and stay in work, pay their mortgage and keep off benefits. Many nurses in the NHS were affected and were asking who benefited if they had to downgrade the number of hours they put in, or leave their patients altogether.

Backbenchers also helped to put pressure on the PM. As well as the senior signatories to Progress’ letter – which included Patricia Hewitt, Hilary Armstrong, Beverley Hughes and Estelle Morris – 88 MPs signed an Early Day Motion and many others made their concerns known in private. The Women’s Parliamentary Labour Party played a role last week raising the issue with Ed Miliband MP, and apparently with Gordon himself on Tuesday. Perhaps if the policy shift had been raised with the Parliamentary Labour Party before Brown included it in his conference speech, the worries about the impact on parents could have been spotted earlier. But compared to other avoidable public outcries such as on the 10p tax change, the decision to hold the Iraq inquiry in private, and the treatment of Gurkhas, the Government have been more fleet of foot.

So this week ends well for the Prime Minister, though that couldn’t have been predicted at the start of the week. The Sun’s attempt to play politics with the Jacqui Janes’ letter backfired so much so that even its former Political Editor, George Pascoe-Watson, along with David Cameron and Pauline Neville-Jones openly criticised its behaviour.

We have still yet to see exactly what the u-turn in practice means for childcare vouchers and Progress will continue to ensure that working parents aren’t unfairly penalised, but Gordon Brown has shown that he can listen and he can lead in a crisis situation this week, and he should be commended for it.




Related posts:

  1. PR: good for the country, good for Labour
  2. Labour has a good record on defence – and we should be proud of talking about it
  3. Cameron’s email is bare-faced cheek at the end of a good week for Labour and a terrible week for his Tories
  4. Have you seen Gordon Brown’s message to Labour members?
  5. Labour can avoid meltdown: but Gordon, why stay?

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →