A year on: a new birth of freedom?

November 4, 2009 8:37 am

Obama electionRichard Robinson‘s Speech Bubble

If truth be told you probably won’t remember what you were doing a year ago today. Barack Obama will – he was elected the 44th president of the United States. Momentarily the world stood still, from New York to New Delhi, Warsaw to Damascus, Madrid to Panama City, right the way across the globe, to celebrate an historic victory as we witnessed what some phrased a “new birth of freedom”.

In a speech comprising precisely 2051 words, the first ever black president of the US spoke to the world from his home city of Chicago, proclaiming:

“it’s been a long time coming, but tonight, because of what we did on this date, in this election, at this defining moment, change has come to America”.

On 4th November 2009, one year later, just what is the reality, how can we judge Obama’s first 10 months in office, and to what extent has change “Obama style” manifested itself?

His critics crowd to line up and fire their ammunition. In his new book, The Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama’s Historic Victory, David Plouffe sets out Obama’s conviction that:

“the country needed deep, fundamental change; Washington wasn’t thinking long-term, the special interests and lobbyists had too much power, and the American people needed to once again trust and engage in their democracy.”.

Yet Plouffe rebuffs poignantly that whilst a lot has happened during Obama’s first year, the audacity of winning has given way to the timidity of governing.

For Catherine Lutz, the 44th president of the United States was elected amid hopes that he would roll back his country’s global dominance. She berates the fact that now he is commander-in-chief of an unprecedented network of military bases that is still expanding. The birth of a new freedom? Not according to Lutz, who highlights how many of the Obama administration’s diplomatic efforts are being directed towards maintaining and garnering new access for the US military across the globe.

The global reach of the US military today is unprecedented and unparalleled. Officially, more than 190,000 troops and 115,000 civilian employees are massed in approximately 900 military facilities in 46 countries and territories (the unofficial figure is far greater).

In the UK, criticism has been equally stinging and only last month the senior political editor of the New Statesman, Mehdi Hasan, continued the offensive when he wrote:

“Obama promised a sharp break from the Bush era, yet he seems to have stepped into the shoes of his disgraced predecessor.”

So, can we find any solace for Obama? It’s easy to forget that he inherited Bush’s inbox from hell. On Healthcare Reform, for example, this has been the bete noire of US politics ever since Hillary Clinton’s plan for universal coverage failed 14 years ago. Progress has been painfully slow over the past year. However, taking into account the conservative and sceptical predilection of the American electorate, it’s hardly surprising they have not yet been wooed as of yet.

Had it not been for the huge expectations in the United States and abroad, Obama’s first 12 months in office might seem more of a success.

Where change has come we can more confidently point to incrementally benign effects. Obama can take comfort in shepherding the US economy back to growth, though rampant unemployment presents a grave political threat. His Nobel Prize suggests he made good on a promise to rescue the US image abroad.

He has also successfully lifted curbs on federal funding for stem cell research, banned torture, outlawed pay discrimination for female workers, reined in predatory credit card companies and launched a push for a green energy economy. And on the international front he has transformed the climate for US diplomacy, and promised a “new beginning” with the Muslim world during a powerful speech in Cairo.

Don’t forget, as well, the genuinely progressive policies on tax that Obama is developing which of course won’t make the headlines, but will nevertheless redistribute income from the top 5% earners above 200,000 dollars to the other 95%.

One year on, President Obama cannot bask in a glorious presidential legacy. Yet he has never aspired to. This is no time to carp from the sidelines. Change is hard, as we on the left well know. Oscar Wilde acknowledged that whilst socialism is great, it takes too many evenings.

Obama still encapsulates in his demeanour, his belief system and the hope that manifested itself so gloriously a year ago today, a brighter tomorrow. His vision and inspiration remains the best opportunity for a re-ordering of a global world that as progressives, we yearn and clamour for, and that we aspire to.




Related posts:

  1. A citizens tax on inheritance would spread wealth, freedom and opportunity
  2. Elections every year?
  3. Attacks on Jews have doubled in the last year
  4. What support for 16 and 17 year old parents really means
  5. What support for 16 and 17 year old parents really means

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →