Big government is vital for getting the three Rs in place

November 16, 2009 9:11 am

Child learning mathsThe Oli De Botton Education Column

I want to stand up for big government. I want to do this because without top down central proscription and national programmes, we would not have made the progress we have done on literacy and numeracy over the past 12 years. And to be clear, I am not suggesting we nationalise our industries, or even that we try to micro-manage more of the education system. I am saying that if we care about fairer life chances for all pupils, we need to keep some things centrally planned and delivered.

In the first few years of New Labour, we introduced a national literacy strategy – big government par excellence. The centre told teachers what to do and when to do it. Advisors, employed by Whitehall, went around the country supporting and challenging practitioners to help kids read, write and count. We also measured and monitored progress with targets, tests and strict accountability regimes. Since then we have introduced programmes like ‘every child a reader‘, ‘every child counts‘ and one-to-one catch up tuition – all managed by our big government.

And the results? Not scores of teachers leaving the profession, or parents worrying about a lack of creativity, but instead great improvements in standards. By 2007, 10 and 14 year olds in England were significantly above average compared to the rest of the world – reversing historic trends. In Scotland where there was no central strategy, no attempt to drive up standards from the centre, achievement in the basics has gone the other way.

Now David Cameron and his ‘progressive’ sidekick Michael Gove think government is the problem, not the answer. We are told that in order to transform our schools we need the voluntary sector, parents and community groups to come on board and run schools. But let’s be serious for a moment. Even if all these organisations were skilled up enough to bring more diversity and excellence to the system, that would be nowhere near sufficient to deliver the outcomes we need. In practice, sometimes you need big government and national programmes to cajole and judge and assess in order to guarantee the things we care about.




Related posts:

  1. There’s no place for Blair as European President
  2. In place of smear
  3. The debate on primaries is no place for factions – this is about how we all adapt to a culture that’s outgrown us
  4. Stoke – just the sort of place that hates the message of the far right!
  5. Government to nationalise east coast railway

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →