Gold nuggets in the Queen’s Speech can help to galvanise Labour

November 19, 2009 6:21 pm

Richard Robinson‘s Speech Bubble

Shortly after I had updated my Facebook status on Tuesday night (a quite innocuous line referring to the Queen’s Speech), friends posted responses which in themselves seemed of little significance.

Yet as the Queen yesterday, aged 83 and for the 55th occasion, presided over the state opening of Parliament, something about the nature of Facebook might serve to inform both Labour and the Conservatives about the shape of the political discourse during the next six months up to the General Election.

Just as Facebook has over an extremely short period transformed the way large numbers of people connect and communicate, Labour, consistently behind in the polls, needs to reconnect with voters, and very quickly.

We know the Conservatives are undoubtedly favourites to form the next Government with the overwhelming majority of ‘experts’Â in the press. However, David Cameron does need to hone a message that is of genuine significance to the voter between now and June. Simply posting a response to the public that his party is not Labour will not necessarily guarantee victory and a mandate to govern.

Furthermore the Queen’s Speech contains several key potential ‘gold nuggets’ on fundamental policy areas covering the economy, child poverty and social care that certainly have the potential to galvanise Labour. Of greater importance though is an opportunity for Labour to paint a clear divide between themselves and the opposition, offering voters a genuine choice at the election.

The Queen’s Speech features thirteen bills including a Bribery Bill which will develop a comprehensive UK strategy for tackling foreign bribery, strengthen work with international partners, and establish a clear legal, regulatory and policy framework. Also a Digital Economy Bill will ensure a competitive digital communication infrastructure, protect intellectual property, and maintain plurality in regional news.

Not too much here to excite voters? Hold the front page! Labour hopes that further meaty and high profile public pronouncements will all serve to help restore confidence and trust in the Government and its battered image. For example, a Fiscal Responsibility Bill commits the government to halving its budget deficit within four years; a Child Poverty Bill will enshrine in law Labour’s ambitious pledge to abolish Child Poverty by 2020; a Social Care Bill will provide for the first time a new national care service with free personal care in their own homes for those with the highest need; and parents have been promised new rights to demand a high quality education for their children.

Does any of this matter though? With only 33 legislative days left in the Lords until the last date for an election, Labour’s critics have dismissed yesterday as a sham. Michael Gove complains it’s simply aspiration when it should be fact and substance. The Sun simply says it’s a waste of time.

Like the bottom two contestants in the X Factor nervously awaiting their fate, Gordon Brown must wait for the public to cast their votes.

As for my Facebook status, in ten years time I hope my post might read ‘whilst Gordon Brown didn’t win the X Factor, he shunned personality politics and restored values to the political discourse’Â.

Over to the public to decide.




Related posts:

  1. Join us for the Queen’s Speech LiveChat
  2. The ICM poll shows we have to get moving – what better opportunity than the Queen’s Speech?
  3. Bills, Draft Bills and Full Text of the Queen’s Speech
  4. Say No to homophobic hate speech
  5. Labour reaction to Cameron’s speech

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →