Progress urges PM to rethink scrapping relief on childcare vouchers

November 11, 2009 1:23 pm

ChildcareBy Jessica Asato / @Jessica_Asato

Yesterday, Progress sent a letter to the Prime Minister signed by 10 backbench Labour MPs including former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt, former Education Secretary Estelle Morris, former Europe minister Caroline Flint and former Children’s minister Beverley Hughes. It asked Gordon Brown to rethink his announcement to remove tax relief on Employer Supported Childcare Vouchers because of the impact it would have on hard-working parents, and particularly on women’s ability to juggle work and childcare. The relief is being taken away to pay for an increase in state support for childcare for 250,000 two-year olds, which Gordon Brown announced in his speech to Labour Party Conference this year.

We believe that extending childcare is an excellent step forward, but not if it comes at the expense of other parents who often struggle to balance work and childcare. The Government’s argument is the tax relief currently goes to higher rate tax-payers, which could be better targeted on poorer families with children aged two. We agree that in general it is a good idea to redistribute government spending from rich to poor, particularly in a tight fiscal situation as we are experiencing now. But by concentrating on the 30% of higher rate taxpayers who receive the benefit, the Government are ignoring the 70% of parents who are basic rate taxpayers and receive childcare vouchers. These people are not rich and they rely heavily on childcare vouchers to ensure that they can cover their childcare responsibilities.

I wrote an article about this issue last week and was moved by the comments I received from working mothers about how this would directly impact on them. I thought that it surely can’t be right to take away a benefit from one group of working women when you’re not likely to encourage many women into work by only funding 10 hours’ childcare for two-year olds. Why can’t we find that funding from somewhere else? Like downgrading Trident, for example?

The strength of anger in the country can be heard loud and clear – the most popular petition on the Downing Street website is one which also asks the PM to rethink his plans with over 76,000 signatories on it.

Progress have also launched a petition and we are asking Labour Party activists and supporters to sign it to see if we can change the Government’s mind.

Ideally this Government would eventually support universal childcare, but until then, let’s not take childcare support away from parents who rely on it in a difficult economic climate.




Related posts:

  1. Proposal #14: Create universal childcare
  2. Tory ‘aid vouchers’ would not benefit the poor
  3. Pensions Industry still rattling about higher tax rate relief
  4. Dizzy needs a rethink
  5. More than scrapping Trident, we need to ditch nuclear weapons altogether

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →