The promise of democracy

November 23, 2009 6:03 pm

IrakliBy Irakli Alasania

Irakli Alasania is the leader of the opposition group in Georgia, Alliance for Georgia, and a former Ambassador to the United Nations. After a recent visit to London, here he guest posts on LabourList about the need for improved democracy in his home country.

Six years ago today, in the Rose Revolution, the people of Georgia peacefully removed a government after it presided over massive electoral fraud. Today we don’t want another revolution but we still need to build a mature democracy.

I don’t for an instant regret supporting the Rose Revolution: I am running for mayor of Tbilisi because I want to see its ideals fulfilled. But I do regret the way so many of the revolutionaries, from President Saakashvili down, have let us down by not strengthening democracy and freedom of speech.

Building a deep democratic culture in Georgia is essential to addressing the issues that affect people’s day to day lives – the lack of healthcare for our citizens, the dramatic increase in unemployment and the need to urgently rebuild our schools. Fixing our political system is part of fixing our country.

President Saakashvili’s economic reforms in the early years were rightly praised, but now even that progress is under threat. The president is introducing a constitutional straightjacket for public spending that will deprive government of the flexibility it will need to face economic turbulence or to invest in health or education. It also proposes massive additional spending cuts to social programmes that are already far from profligate.

Foreign investment is down by 80% and the second largest British investor in our country has warned that our economy is being damaged by “criminals”. It is perhaps no wonder that a 5.5% fall in economic output is predicted for 2009, and, although the true figure is probably much higher, unemployment remains at 17%. A third of our population – more than 5 million people live on less than 2 dollars a day.

Georgia does not have the natural resources to be a big commodity exporter and it is by adding value that we will get the jobs and investment needs to escape poverty and unemployment. But without better schools, modern universities and new skills we just will not be able to compete. Starving the education system in the hope of attracting foreign investment misses the point of why investors would pick Georgia in the first place.

That such potentially disastrous policies can be shoved through without much debate is a product of the thinning of Georgian democracy. Sadly for the President he is, even now, finding it hard to realise that he cannot go on with ever greater centralisation of power in his hands and that the people of Georgia need to be given a greater say over their country’s future.

The President seems to think the best place to start is with renewed mandates for local government. But even though he has announced early local elections, he still seems unable to decide if he will let those elections be held on a free and fair basis. There are even signs that he is willing to open the system up but is being increasingly hemmed in by hardliners in his own party who cannot contemplate the idea that democratic power has to be shared.

President Saakashvili knows just how important local government can be. His powerbase before the Rose Revolution was as chairman of the Tbilisi city council. He now promises a direct election for that mayoralty and for mayors of another four of Georgia’s biggest cities, but his ruling party seem to want to keep the existing system.

The reasons for their resistance to change aren’t difficult to find. Last time we elected a city council in Tbilisi, in 2006, the electoral system gave the president’s party over 90% of the seats for just under two-thirds of the vote. Since then the president’s party has lost significant support in the capital but if we keep the same system, unfair elections are guaranteed.

My challenge to President Saakashvili is that he shows himself as a real leader and demonstrates to the world that he understands the true meaning of democracy – a readiness to lose elections as well as win them.

Earlier this year we demanded early presidential and parliamentary elections. During the rallies opposition activists were beaten and tortured, had their property seized and relatives thrown in jail as political hostages on trumped up charges. My party and its allies have suffered a lot as well, but we managed to overcome psychological barriers and engage in the political process.

The President should recognise that after all this, it is remarkable that the opposition is prepared to discuss repairing our political system, improving the electoral environment and, if major issues about the election are agreed, expresses its readiness to participate in the promised upcoming local and direct mayoral elections.

But the moment will not last forever. And here I would refer to the US Vice-President, Mr. Biden. Speaking to our Parliament in July, he said that the democratic ideals of the Rose Revolution could only be realised when “government is transparent, accountable and fully participatory”.

President Saakashvili can be the man who ends Georgia’s cycle of revolutionary discontent and broken governments by delivering on the simple promises he has made to us, the Georgian people, and to our international partners.

A blustering autocrat with a reckless love of political gambling or the man who made good, eventually, on his promises of democracy: the choice is his to make.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →