Which Way’s Left?

November 2, 2009 8:37 am

Open LeftBy Graeme Cooke

We launched Open Left back at the start of the summer by asking the simple but central question of what it means to be on the left in British politics today. Since then we’ve had over a hundred people post their views, demonstrating the diversity of reasons that people are motivated and passionate about the potential of centre-left politics. There are some great contributions and you can read what people said here.

Open Left is about renewing our thinking and ideas, in the spirit of idealism, radicalism and pluralism. That means starting with first principles, to consider fundamental questions about the purpose of our politics. Only by being clear about what we believe and care about can we build a powerful and coherent policy agenda. I believe there is a great deal that unites the centre-left today – but we must also address head on the areas where people might reasonably disagree.

We think there are five such areas and we’ve tried to encapsulate them in the following core questions:

* Should the Left draw more on its social democratic or radical liberal traditions in looking to the future?

* Should the equality that the Left now pursues be more focused on capabilities than just resources?

* Should the Left seek to shape a fundamentally different model of capitalism in the aftermath of the banking crisis and subsequent recession?

* Should the Left seek to foster a shared sense of identity, morality and community, or embrace a diversity in each?

* Should the Left be collecting or dispersing democratic and political power in seeking to bring about change?

Confronting these questions is about much more than simply generating an interesting debate about ideas. They speak to the central political questions facing Britain today and in the years ahead. Whether we are concerned with the crisis in our politics, the future of our economy, or the health of our society – from public services and democratic reform, to the nature of capitalism and the response to immigration – our positions on these questions cuts to the heart of any future policy agenda. These are questions we cannot avoid. And the answers shape the future direction of the Left.

To lead the debate, we have asked some of Britain’s leading political thinkers to address these questions – and we’ll be publishing their responses in a collection of papers in the near future. But we think they need to be debated as widely as possible – so we confront the choices and trades off they entail.

Throughout this week we’ll be setting out more details and kicking off a debate about each of these questions on the Open Left site – starting today with the future of our economy following the financial crisis and recession. I really hope you’ll come and get involved and engage with and develop the ideas here on LabourList.

We’ll also be discussing these issues, and wider political and ideological renewal, at a joint Open Left/Labour History Group event on 25th November. At Which Way’s Left? we’ll be asking what lessons from the past we can take as inspiration for the future – focusing on the thinking and politics of RH Tawney, Herbert Morrison, Tony Crosland and Charlie Turnock.

Sign up here to come to the event.




Related posts:

  1. Live chat with James Purnell on what it means to be on the left
  2. Ways to cut the deficit without really trying, part 94: tax school fees
  3. Turn Left: A Review of the Open Left launch
  4. Open Left launch with James Purnell and Jon Cruddas – live tweets
  5. A centre-left consensus is not enough – we need a global progressive movement

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →
  • News NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    There’s some devastating YouGov polling on NHS “reform” for Cameron to digest today. Firstly, the public are firmly against his reforms. Almost half (48%) of the public oppose the reforms, compared to just 18% who back them. But it’s not just the broad idea of the reforms that the public oppose – it’s the specifics. On the question of whether increasing competition in the NHS will improve health services (something which Labour were not against in principle in office), the [...]

    Read more →