Debunking the myth that green taxes are a front for raising Government tax takes

December 10, 2009 11:42 am

Copenhagen SeraBy Emma Burnell

Anyone who’s ever read a comment thread after any article anywhere on the web will recognise a few usual tired lines that are trotted out by the deniers time and again, however often they have been thoroughly debunked. Ed Miliband took on some of the most obvious ones before leaving for Copenhagen.

Another line consistently trotted out is the idea that climate change is a front for raising the Government tax take.

So let’s be very clear: If green taxes increase the overall tax take over time they will have failed.

Green taxes are about shifting the burden of taxation from goods to bads, and encouraging behaviour change by making the right environmental choice the right financial choice too. Putting a high price on carbon is unequivocally not about raising more money. It’s about creating less carbon. If the money raised goes up, that will indicate that we are not reducing carbon, and that is the primary purpose of the tool of this form of taxation.

Like all taxes on social bads – for example alcohol and tobacco – the taxes taken under carbon reduction schemes will also help to pay for the essential measures needed to mitigate the worst of the damage and to adapt to the damage that is being caused. In the case of tobacco this money goes to education, counselling and the health service. With climate change, it will go to great programmes like CESP, to building flood defences and to investing in low carbon alternatives.

I am not going to claim that there will never be a year in which the tax take from green taxes is not higher than it might otherwise have been. A particularly cold winter, a spurt of economic growth as we come out of recession, these things happening near the beginning of any tax regime, could cause anomalies, but overall, for these taxes to be successful the take must go down.

So next time a denier tells you that it’s all about raising your taxes, consider whether it’s actually about their unwillingness to behave in a socially responsible way. Or pay for the damage they are doing to you and your planet.




Related posts:

  1. Labour supporters: Increase taxes on the well off
  2. Ed Miliband announces £20m for research in low carbon industries and £10 million for green neighbourhoods programme
  3. Green Designs
  4. Labour must become a green party
  5. Labour must make the next election a ‘green election’

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →