Iran isn’t doing itself any favours this week

December 1, 2009 3:58 pm

Mahmoud AhmedinejadBy Luke Bozier / @Luke_cb

Perhaps it’s to the credit of Western powers that there hasn’t been an aerial bombing of Iran just yet, or perhaps countries like the United States and the UK aren’t even in a position to stretch the theatre of war to a third front, what with two ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The diplomatic process to deal with Iran’s nuclear ambitions has been simmering away for what seems like an eternity already; I remember as far back as 2004/2005 and perhaps even earlier, warnings of “imminent war” following failures in negotiations. But alas, we are still very much in the diplomacy phase, and thus far even the most hawkish governments in Washington and Jerusalem have been restrained in their approach.

Is all this about to change? Iran this week ratcheted up tensions a notch by announcing plans to defy the international community and build ten new uranium enrichment sites. And to make matters worse, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard last week captured a group of young Brits sailing just inside an area of water which is disputed between Iran and the tiny Gulf state of Bahrain. In the Spring of 2007, Iran famously captured a group of British navy soldiers and held them captive for a time, embarrassing the British Government by dragging on the saga and refusing to release the group until they had gained as much public relations value from them as they could.

According to reports coming from the office of the Iranian President, Iran has promised measures that are “hard and serious”, if the group are found to have had “evil intentions”. How one quantifies and proves evil intentions in this respect, I don’t know, but it’s clear that the Iranian Government is willing to make big a deal of this seemingly innocent and accidental stray into their territorial water.

This surely sends the wrong message to diplomats in London, Washington and Beijing, at an important time in the long-running diplomatic negotiations. Along with the announcements regarding the new uranium processing plants, the international community would be right to withhold trust in the Iranian regime.

Later today, President Obama is to announce that a further 34,000 American troops will be sent to Afghanistan. The whole world seems to be focussed intently on how to get out of the quagmire that Afghanistan could become. Iraq has swapped places with Afghanistan to become the “forgotten front”, although the situation there has stabilised somewhat over the last year. The Middle East peace project is painfully slow in making progress. With all of these issues on the President’s desk, perhaps it would be easy to forget the huge white elephant in the region, which on the surface, at least, has nuclear ambitions.

This week, Tehran sent the world a wake up call.






Related posts:

  1. All presumptions about Iran are drawn down as we witness people just like us battered – but what about the other Iran?
  2. Participate constructively in the Iran protests
  3. Britain has to look back before it can look forward if it hopes to build diplomatic relations with Iran
  4. Iraq, Iran and a game of diplomatic chess
  5. Cameron’s email is bare-faced cheek at the end of a good week for Labour and a terrible week for his Tories

Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Livingstone campaign statement on New Statesman interview

    Livingstone campaign statement on New Statesman interview

    A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Ken is clearly saying the advance of lesbian and gay people into politics is unequivocally a good thing. ‘Unlike many in the Conservative Party he has fought for equality for LGBT rights throughout his life including when it was highly controversial. He established Britain’s first civil partnership register, fought Clause 28 and backed LGBT Pride. ‘Ken will reinstate London’s LGBT Pride annual reception at City Hall, put the Greater London Authority back into the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cutting edge Ken

    Cutting edge Ken

    If someone had told me a year ago that Ken Livingstone would be the first politician in the world to announce a policy by text message frankly I wouldn’t have believed them. Neither would I have believed them if they’d told me Ken Livingstone would be the first British politician to have a bespoke social media site created which tracks member activity and uses pioneering methods which has resulted in record levels of activists out on the streets. The truth [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The launch of Liberal Left is to be welcomed

    The launch of Liberal Left is to be welcomed

    The launch of Liberal Left is to be welcomed. Anything that challenges the Centre-right voting block of the Coalition is clearly a good thing.  Anything that helps develop centre-left relationships as an alterative now, tomorrow or in the future to a Conservative led government is to be welcomed.  With Labour currently struggling to maintain a healthy poll lead it would be stupid not to look for political partners outside of Labour’s ranks. But there is more than electoral necessity at [...]

    Read more →
  • News Birmingham by-election on the way?

    Birmingham by-election on the way?

    There’s an interesting post by Rafael Behr over at the New Statesman today about the possibility of Labour MPs standing down from Parliament to run either as mayoral candidates or police commissioners. According to Behr, much of the interest is around Birmingham: “Two names often cited as possible candidates for the Birmingham mayoralty are Liam Byrne, shadow work and pensions secretary and MP for the city’s Hodge Hill constituency, and Gisela Stuart, MP for Edgbaston. Of the two, fans of [...]

    Read more →
  • News

    New pro-Labour, anti-coalition Lib Dem group launched

    A new Lib Dem group – Liberal Left – have announced their launch today. The group is opposed to Lib Dem membership of the coalition, and appeared avowedly pro-Labour. Their launch statement includes the phrase: “A future coalition with Labour and others on the liberal left is more likely to secure Liberal Democrat goals than a further coalition with the Conservatives and we should actively work to make that possible.” More on this at The Guardian.  

    Read more →