Iraq Inquiry: separating myths from facts over the 45 minute claim

December 15, 2009 7:26 pm

By Greg Pope MP

Greg Pope is a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee. This is the second of a series of contributions during the Chilcot Inquiry.

Conservative MP Adam Holloway (who, by the way, has recently written an excellent piece on Afghanistan) has now revealed that the intelligence source for the claim that Saddam could launch chemical and biological weapons (CBW) within 45 minutes was, he says, a taxi driver in Iraq’s western desert.

You will recall that at the time, September 2002, many in the media linked this 45 minute claim to Iraq’s increasing missile capacity and reached the conclusion that Britain’s strategically vital military bases on Cyprus were vulnerable: a case of two plus two equalling quite a lot more than four.

I think its fair to say that the media were not energetically dissuaded from this approach by the Government. Add to the mix the widespread view that Alastair Campbell had “sexed up” the Joint Intelligence Committee’s (JIC) dossier by inserting this 45 minute claim and you have a heady cocktail of deception designed to dupe Parliament and the British people into supporting the invasion of Iraq.

Except the truth may be a little different to this version of events. The source for the 45 minute claim was described by the Foreign Office at the time as “an established, reliable and longstanding line of reporting”. Not only was he not a taxi driver but, I was informed by an impeccable source, he was in fact a defecting high-ranking officer in the Iraqi army. This officer talked of chemical and biological “missiles” which could be deployed within 45 minutes. The word “missile” and how it was translated from Arabic into English is crucial here – in English it implies a long-range capacity of the kind that Saddam was developing; in fact, as we now know, the defector was talking about battlefield weapons such as mortars and short-range shells. This would have made much more sense as this was exactly the kind of CBW that Saddam had already used in the Iran-Iraq war.

As for the sexing up of the dossier, the facts are more prosaic than the media hype. Much has been made of the fact that the 45 minute claim was not in the earlier drafts of the dossier, and some have claimed that it was inserted at the last minute on the diktat of Mr Campbell; it is true that it was inserted late on, the reason being that the raw intelligence was only received by the Secret Intelligence Service in August 2002. It was assessed and first appeared in a draft JIC dossier on 10 September 2002, before Alastair Campbell had even seen it. There is not even a scintilla of doubt that Alastair Campbell did not insert the 45 minute claim.

There is much to concern us, not least the over-reliance on a single intelligence source; and, despite the fact that Saddam had previously used battlefield CBWs, the stockpiles to which he referred were never found. But we shouldn’t be distracted by tales of taxi drivers and media myths about Alastair Campbell.




Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →