The Audacity to Win: empower the grassroots with a clear message and strategy based on principle

December 6, 2009 6:40 pm

Author:

Share this Article

PlouffeA Review by Mark Glover

David Plouffe’s book, ‘The Audacity to Win‘ provides strategic insights into the Obama campaign that gripped everyone in 2007/08 from the man who made the decisions about running the campaign on the ground. Whilst David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs were the main figures on message and media, it was Plouffe who drove the campaign, deciding where money was to be spent and how the campaign was to be organised.

As he gives a chronological account of the campaign, Plouffe is not averse to explaining, in his words, what worked and what didn’t. Interestingly, the most exciting chapters of the book relate to Obama’s Primary campaign against Clinton; particularly in the build up to Iowa and Super Tuesday, where the narrative is fast-paced and the insights fascinating. It is useful to address some of the insights individually as they might inform Labour’s campaigning.

Empowering your grassroots and creating an enthusiasm gap
Plouffe explains the campaign’s philosophy: that it was not Obama’s campaign, rather it belonged to the 6,000 staff and almost 1,000,000 volunteers and donors – who knocked on doors, phoned voters and made donations. These volunteers were recruited via the internet or in attendance at massive rallies across America. Much of the work was devolved and volunteers were challenged to meet targets, not just weekly requests to do something. Those that did well, received face time with Obama, who recognised their contribution. This approach created an ‘enthusiasm gap’ between fired-up Democrats, 90% of whom were under 30, and less enthusiastic Republicans.

Integrated approach
The online strategy reinforced the campaign on the ground and events and rallies were used to drive people to the Obama website. This integrated approach led to supporters organising groups on Facebook and other social media platforms. This organic growth of the campaign reinforced the official activity.

It is an interesting fact that although these sites were monitored to ensure they were not producing conflicting material, the campaign actively encouraged online groups to set up and welcomed new approaches to achieving the campaign’s objectives.

This integration and natural growth online led to the huge fundraising capacity of the campaign overall ( billion raised) and the massive number of volunteers it inspired, including a greater turnout from BME and younger voters than ever before. Indeed, pollsters discovered that the election did not change the mind of those who voted in previous elections – amongst which group the results were almost tied – but it inspired a whole new generation of voters who fell 3-1 to Obama.

Clear principles and strategy
The campaign spent time at the beginning identifying its principles to ensure that the messages of the campaign would reinforce them. This approach penetrated the way the campaign responded to Republican and Democratic attacks during the primaries – strong rebuttal but no fighting in the gutter. Attacks were launched on McCain, but only in response to McCain’s attacks and only based on fact, not on slanderous hearsay. Often in the face of press criticism, particularly of Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright’s attacks on America, the campaign’s response was thoughtful – a keynote speech on race – used to define the candidate on a matter of principle. Indeed never did the campaign feel they had to pander to the press if it was contrary to the principles of the campaign.

On strategy Obama reached out from the traditional methods of campaigning and spoke to people directly, either through the internet or the 6,500,000 email addresses the campaign collected. This meant ordinary voters were briefed directly on an issue and could then act as advocates in their cities and towns.

As Plouffe comments:

“We started the campaign with the firm but risky belief that we could radically expand the electorate and that we could count on our grassroots supporters to execute our plan. This strategy proved wildly successful.”

My reading of this book reinforces my belief that Labour has to radically reconsider its interaction with members, both in practical terms but also in terms of the recognition that members receive for their activism and support.

For political campaign geeks this book is a Christmas must!




Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Ed Miliband statement on Woolwich murder

    Ed Miliband statement on Woolwich murder

    In a statement this evening, Ed Miliband said: “This is a truly appalling murder which will shock the entire country. “All of my thoughts are with the family and friends of the victim. “The British people will be horrified by what has happened in Woolwich. They will be united in believing that this terror on our streets cannot be allowed to stand. “The Labour Party will offer the Government our complete support in establishing the facts of what happened and [...]

    Read more →
  • News Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    With much jubilation, the 3rd reading of the same-sex marriage bill passed the House of Commons last night, carried through on the weight of Labour votes, but how have individual MPs voted on this bill? In the 2nd reading of the equal marriage bill, Labour MP voting totals were: 217 – for 22 – against 14 – non-voters For the third reading 192 – for 14 – against 49 – non-voters —————————————————————- 192 Labour MPs who voted yes on 3rd reading (9 didn’t [...]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Speaking at the Google Big Tent event Ed Miliband said (please note, Miliband spoke without notes, but this is the text released by the party): It is great to be here inside the Google Big Tent. My sons Daniel and Sam think I do a very boring job, so they will be excited when I tell them I appeared along with the “Killer Robots” and the “Captain of the Moonshots” at your sessions. I’d like to start by showing you [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Unions The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    Lord Mandelson, or Baron Mandelson of Foy, as he should be referred to since he was packed off to the House of Lords by a small cabal, recently accused the Unite union of ‘manipulating selection procedures’ in the Labour Party. He went on to warn Ed Miliband that this ‘stores up danger for a future Labour government’. Irony has always been in as short supply as sheer chutzpah has been plentiful with old Mandy – but since his faithful disciple [...]

    Read more →
  • News Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Cameron says no more EU-turns “After one of his most difficult weeks since becoming prime minister, David Cameron put in a polished and assured peformance on the Today programme this morning. The most notable line came on Europe, with Cameron [...]

    Read more →