Labour must avoid the self-destruct button – and turn its fire on the Tories

January 17, 2010 8:08 pm

Osborne CameronBy David Beeson

One of my favourites quotes from that classic film Dr Strangelove is ‘I think the auto-destruct mechanism got hit and blew itself up.’ Wouldn’t it be great if we could find a way to destroy the Labour Party’s self-destruct button?

After all, if I admire David Cameron for anything, it has to be for the extraordinary capacity he has demonstrated for shooting himself in the foot. Does he want to recognise the status of marriage in the tax system? He definitely does, he definitely doesn’t, he definitely does again. Is he going to build another 5000 prison places? Absolutely. Or perhaps not. Is he going to cut the deficit? You bet he is. Is he going to cut taxes for the wealthiest? Without a shadow of a doubt. Does he have the intellectual horsepower to see the contradiction? Not that he’s admitting to. He comes across as dithering, lost, unprincipled.

Before Christmas that was all becoming increasingly clear. And it was reflected in the slipping Conservative poll lead. Wonderful, I thought. We’ve still got a fighting chance.

Now whatever else one might say about Geoff Hoon and Patricia Hewitt, I really don’t think they’re dumb. So there’s no way they can have failed to understand that the only benefit that could possibly have arisen from raising the question of the party leadership this close to a general election would be felt by the other side.

What on Earth were they thinking of?

We have a job in front of us. It’s to try to protect this country from the damage a Cameron government would do. The last lot were awful: remember Thatcher with her Section 28, with the Poll Tax, with Railway privatisation – or even with something as stupidly trivial as having Gerry Adams spouting away on TV, but with an actor reading his words. You could see him speaking; you could see his body language; you could even hear his words; you just couldn’t hear his voice. That’s the level of infantile nonsense that a rigidly ideological Tory government took us to.

The only comfort the present lot give us is that Cameron isn’t showing anything like the competence of the Thatcher team. You can hope that some of his blows will turn out to be as weak as his contradictory, blundering policy statements now. But it’s cold comfort: it’s like saying that faced with an angry adolescent with an axe in a crowded room, you’d prefer him to be blindfolded. The random damage he could do might be worse than if he could see what he was hitting.

So, Geoff and Patricia, if you feel the need to undermine a Party leader, at least make it the leader of the other Party.

For the next few months, at least, we need everyone who actually cares about a fair society out there battling to get the current government re-elected. Defects it may have, but they’re nothing compared to the pain the Tories would cause, when they start running public services back down to Thatcherite levels and boosting unemployment by killing off any kind of economic recovery.

We need public statements supporting that goal. And if you can’t make any, well, try a few months of healing silence. For all our sakes.




Related posts:

  1. Labour can avoid meltdown: but Gordon, why stay?
  2. Labour MPs turn into a bunch of tweets
  3. The Vestas lock-in: Labour’s chance to turn corporate disgrace into environmental leadership
  4. The only way to avoid fudging on expenses is to give MPs better pay
  5. After ACAS, how we can avoid more Lindseys and put working people first – across the EU

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →