The party of unrelenting change? Tonight, Labour can prove it

January 18, 2010 3:34 pm

Ballot VoteBy Jessica Asato / @Jessica_Asato

It’s sad to see that after all the decent, principled arguments that have been made in favour of electoral reform, the debate appears to be descending into partisan political interest in the Labour Party. Tonight, the Parliamentary Labour Party has the opportunity to make political history by committing Labour to a referendum on the Alternative Vote. But instead, stories abound of MPs mounting a rearguard action to scupper the plans because they are worried they might lose their seat if votes start to count.

But that’s the point, isn’t it? If safe seat MPs are getting worried about the prospect of AV, it’s because they don’t command the majority support of the public. I don’t want to see Labour colleagues losing at the election after next. But I do want to see them fighting for every last vote, and that is what AV will force them to do.

AV wouldn’t have been my preferred system. I think Gordon Brown should have made the bold choice and gone for a more proportional system such as AV+. But we are where we are and at least AV will get rid of the situation, once and for all, of people being able to rightly say that their vote doesn’t count.

After the expenses crisis, the Labour Party needs to show that it has got the ideas to restore some trust to the democratic process. It also needs to demonstrate that the old bully-boy politics of non-majoritarian rule is going to be consigned to history and that we are willing to embrace a more pluralist politics which recognises difference and doesn’t immediately perceive it as dissent.

AV is a symbolic start to what needs to be a much wider push for reform, including electing the House of Lords, removing the power from the Government to set the Parliamentary timetable and appoint Select Committee chairs, and introducing recall. Labour doesn’t have much time left to put at least some of this in train. I have no idea why the Government has dragged its feet for so long on the recommendation’s of Tony Wright’s reform of the House of Commons Committee report which was published last November. Many of the suggestions in the report could be implemented without huge legislative upheaval. If Gordon Brown was serious in his speech to the Fabian Society last Saturday that “Trust in politics and constitutional reform are on the ballot paper” at the next election, he’d do well to embrace the Wright report as soon as possible.

And the rest of the PLP would do well to endorse the idea of a referendum on AV if Labour wins the next election at their meeting tonight. If they step back, Labour will miss a prime opportunity to show it means business on reform. It would be what the public has come to expect. Let’s hope our parliamentarians prove me wrong.




Related posts:

  1. The change we need in the Labour Party
  2. Primed for Change: why we need primaries in the Labour party
  3. Constitutional change is welcome, but we also need to reform the Labour Party
  4. The Party of European Socialists UPDATE: The group, not the Party, will change its name
  5. I don’t care which hands were forced and who briefed what – our MPs must get out on the doostep tonight

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →