A new banking settlement

February 26, 2010 8:58 am

Compass

By Joe Cox / @CompassOffice

It’s boom time in the city: bank bonuses are up 40% despite the windfall tax and hedge funds are making their best returns in a decade. Yet it seems the boom ends at the gates of RBS. Yesterday they posted a £3.6bn loss at the same time as paying out £1.3bn bonuses.

Unsurprisingly the public are angry, worried and conflicted. They want their money back but they know that reckless short-term gambling from RBS could lead to another crisis. Our polling carried out by YouGov confirms this; 75% are worried that banks have not changed and are still not being properly regulated which could be bad for the economy.

That’s why Compass has put together a set of six policies that amount to a new banking settlement; a mixture of short, medium and long term measures that would help tackle excessive pay and bring the financial sector closer in line with the needs of the economy and society. These policies would help curb excessive pay, claw back money for the taxpayer and raise money for spending on socially useful projects.

The six policies are:

* Remuneration Caps - A cap across the whole of the UK banking sector would help prevent the movement of staff away from RBS to higher paying rivals that are less constrained by government pressure and public outrage. It would reduce the staff pay bill (by £512 million this year), saving the taxpayer money and shoring up the balance sheet.

* Extending the Bankers Windfall Tax to other institutions such as hedge funds (supported by 60% of those polled), which would further prevent staff from leaving RBS and seeking higher remuneration in other sectors. Hedge funds have benefited from the state bailout, so their omission from the windfall tax is difficult to justify.

* The separation of retail and investment banks, supported by 68% of those polled. This would stop the riskiest practices being undertaken with ordinary depositors’ money. It would also go some way to tackling the ‘too big to fail’ dilemma.

* Repeating the one-off windfall tax on bankers’ bonuses annually, supported by 59% of those polled. The one-off measure, although welcome, has not brought about a cultural change in the City. The short-termism encouraged through bonuses should be discouraged through permanent taxation.

* A financial transactions tax, supported by 51% of those polled. This would allow the wealth of the financial sector to raise money for socially useful causes.

* A High Pay Commission, supported by 65% of those polled. An open, balanced and thorough examination into pay and income at the top in order to find long term and tested solutions into how better to reduce excessive risk and excessive rewards.

So far, the government has stressed that “RBS is subject to the toughest restrictions on bonuses anywhere in the world.” Yet the financial sector is probably more fundamental to the UK’s economy than any other- therefore it should be regulated more stringently. A new banking settlement would be hugely popular. It is also the right thing to do.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →