Anti-semitism is alive and well in Britain – how Labour should fight it

February 10, 2010 2:30 pm

Anti Semitism

By Paul Richards

The casual anti-Jewishness of most of British society, prevalent before the war, and found everywhere from the royal family to TS Eliot to George Orwell, has largely disappeared. Instead, like a virulent bacillus, hatred of Jews finds new hosts: amongst Islamist hate-mongers, the ultra-left and neo-fascists on the streets, and in the upper echelons of academia and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

When Rowan Laxton, a senior official at the FCO screamed ‘fucking Jews’ whilst watching news reports from southern Israel at the London Business School gym, was it really a ‘moment of madness’ as he claimed in court? Or did it reflect the culture of his workplace?

When former ambassador Oliver Miles wrote in the Independent on Sunday that the Chilcot Inquiry would be undermined by the fact that ‘Both Gilbert and Freedman are Jewish, and Gilbert at least has a record of active support for Zionism’ was he alone amongst former and current members of the diplomatic service in worrying about Jewish influence in public life?

When leftwing activists in the University and College Union single out Israeli academics for boycott, and claim to be against antisemitism, how can they justify the contradiction in their actions? Or when Peter Kilfoyle publicly attacks a Jewish woman Labour parliamentary candidate for, in effect, being ‘not from round here’ what did he think the impact would be?

Inside all kinds of respectable organisations and institutions, from universities to trade unions, there exists a philosophy of antisemitism, usually bound up with a desire to eradicate Israel, which creates a climate for antisemitism in its more traditional and familiar violent forms to flourish.

Sometimes it’s just words. There are a million and one examples on the internet. Use of words such as ‘Zionist’ or ‘Israelite’ can mask the real meaning: Jew. I think it was Iain Dale who worked out a rule of thumb for how long it takes for people writing responses to a blogpost on any aspect of politics to start going on about Israel and Zionists.

A new report published this morning shows that antisemitism in Britain goes way beyond words. The Community Security Trust (CST) has published its survey of antisemitic incidents over the past year, and it makes sickening reading. The Community Security Trust (CST) has a long and respected record in working with the police and local authorities to monitor and record incidents of attacks on Jews. Gordon Brown is reported this morning to be “troubled” by the findings

There were more antisemitic incidents recorded in 2009 than in any other year since records began 26 years ago. 924 incidents were reported, including violent assaults, desecration of Jewish property and death threats. The 69 per cent rise on 2008 followed a record number of antisemitic attacks recorded in January and February 2009, during and after the conflict between Israeli forces and Hamas in Gaza. Gaza was mentioned in about a quarter of the cases. There were 288 incidents in January last year alone.

As the previous spike in attacks occurred in 2006 during Israel’s war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, you can only conclude that groups and individuals in the UK use the actions of the Israeli government as an excuse to attack British Jews. Linking British Jews to the actions of Israel’s government or military is perhaps one of the most insidious forms of antisemitism, because it rests on the idea that all Jews are part of a global cabal, that each is culpable for the misdemeanors of the others, and that British Jews are somehow ‘alien’, with allegiances to a foreign power. I won’t name the British minister who, when meeting with Jewish community leaders during the Gaza conflict, referred to ‘your government’ when he (or she) meant the government of Israel. The idea that Jews are internationally linked, and have allegiances which transcend their own national states is pure Nazism. It is at the heart of what government officials call the ‘Al Qaeda narrative’. It is poison.

The challenge for Labour is huge. We need to adopt the same rigorous opposition to antisemitism as we have done to other forms of racism, sexism and homophobia. That includes challenging groups such as the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) which in the past has boycotted Holocaust Memorial Day and has in its membership people whose views do not fit easily into a modern liberal context. It means ministers working closely with Jewish groups and organisations such as the CST. It means looking again at the recommendations of the Parliamentary Group against Antisemitism, chaired by Labour MP John Mann, and implementing them without delay. Most of all, it means rooting out and challenging antisemitic attitudes, no matter how articulately put, or semantically disguised.

This article was also published by Progress.

Related posts:

  1. Attacks on Jews have doubled in the last year
  2. Causes to fight for: a strong Britain in the world
  3. Causes to fight for: protecting Britain’s youth from knife crime
  4. Labour and I will fight Cameron’s Tories – and fight to win
  5. Exposing the BNP’s anti-Muslim lies

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →