Building power, deepening democracy

February 22, 2010 2:33 pm

Power2010

By George Gabriel

It was written on LabourList some weeks ago that if the “constitutional reform bill” is to be a “democratic renewal bill” its process must come to reflect its ends. Democratic renewal cannot be achieved behind closed doors, power cannot be given, and to bring people back into politics, the political system must be prepared to have its agenda set by the people. Recent initiatives from the Labour Party towards a fairer voting system, strengthening Parliament and the introduction of a written constitution are to be lauded. But, it was argued, the people must be brought in.

For that reason it has been exciting to watch James Purnell‘s recent offensive on behalf of a procedural ethic:

“Power is not a means to an end – it is the end. The process is the goal: to create powerful people, through organisation and action, based on the creed that “if the people have the power to act, in the long run they will, most of the time, reach the right decisions”.

Where the process is the goal, we help avoid the perverse sacrifice of ends to means, the grim lesson of failed 20th century utopian projects – evidently still to be learned by some as we increasingly learn of complicity in torture in the name of our rights and freedoms.

So where are the processes? London Citizens is rightly cited by Purnell as at the forefront of this battle, building power in and among the most downtrodden. Its slow, patient and at times dogged growth and campaigning is a testament to both the challenges of such an approach but also its fidelity to this core principle.

Power2010 is another candidate. With over 4,000 ideas for democratic renewal submitted by the public, a deliberative poll of a random sample of the public, and almost 100,000 votes cast to forge the people’s proposals for democratic renewal, we see another process alive and well. You have until midnight tonight to cast your vote and add your voice to this unique campaign. Please do so here.

So is Purnell right to conclude, as any progressive must, that the people, in general and under favourable conditions, make the right decisions? London Citizens’ keenest campaign is for a living wage, an idea generated and sustained by the support of its member community groups – a proposal now roundly backed by most economists and built on a sound case study with the introduction of the minimum wage.

And what about Power2010′s online vote? The leaderboard currently runs: Move to a more Proportional Voting System; Scrap ID Cards and Roll Back the Database State; Introduce a Fully Elected Second Chamber; English Votes on English Laws; and a Written Constitution.

And the beauty of truly popular processes? If you don’t like the outcomes you have a right, as much as anyone, to take a lead and have your voice counted and your argument heard.

Building power in people, building a truer democracy in all social spheres is the agenda. London Citizens and Power2010 show two creative ways of taking the agenda forward – the state cannot do it alone, and the market won’t.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →