If David Cameron wants to support single parents he can start by ditching his marriage tax breaks

February 26, 2010 7:18 pm

Author:

Share this Article

Gingerbread

By Tim Horton

The news this week that David Cameron has backed the charity Gingerbread‘s campaign to challenge prejudice against single parents must have struck his Tory advisors as a perfect piece of brand decontamination.

Mention “Tories” and “single mothers” and most people will think of Peter Lilley absurdly breaking into song at the 1992 Conservative conference to describe his “little list of benefit offenders,” which of course included “young ladies who get pregnant just to jump the housing list”. These theatrics heralded an especially nasty streak of judgemental social conservatism that was to mark the dying days of the last Tory government. Who can forget John Redwood’s angry tirade in 1995 about “illegitimate” children, in which he argued that single parents should be denied state support until they had first tried to give their children up for adoption?

So goodbye to all that? If only. For Cameron combines his pledge not to stigmatise single parents with political language and policies that risk only deepening the social prejudices they face.

The sad truth is that single parents are all too often subject to attacks in our politics and media – not least in the tabloid press, who seem to trade in painting single mothers as irresponsible freeloaders and bad parents. Talking to single parents, Gingerbread found they felt hurt and angry about being portrayed, as one put it, as “second-class citizens who are blamed for the majority of social ills”.

Gingerbread’s research shows just how wrong the public stereotype of a teenage mum on benefits is. Just one in fifty single mothers is a teenager (and only one in eight is under 25). Their average age is 36. Most have been married before and never expected to be raising a child alone. Most are in paid work.

What proportion of girls under 16 get pregnant each year? The public’s average estimate was 23%. The actual figure? 0.8% – thirty times less. To be fair, though, the public are nearer the mark than Conservative Central Office was last week. Its claim that under-16 pregnancy rates were 54% in deprived areas, ten times the actual figure, suggests one would scarcely be able to walk the streets of our inner cities without tripping over pregnant teens. (And the attempt to play to public stereotypes is a far worse offence than misplacing a decimal point).

Lone parents spending benefit cash on booze and fags? Also wide of the mark. They spend just £2.32 a week on alcohol and tobacco, compared to over £8 a week by couple families out of work. Recent social research also undermines this popular suspicion. Jane Waldfogel studied how the spending patterns of low-income families changed when their financial support was increased through tax credits in 1999. These parents didn’t spend the extra resources on alcohol or tobacco, but on their children and on household necessities.

Given public attitudes are often so far adrift from reality, it’s welcome that all main party leaders have signed up to Gingerbread’s “Let’s lose the labels” campaign pledge. But for this to be more than warm words, it will require real changes.

On policy it will mean ending the ‘Dutch auction‘ among political parties on ever-tougher welfare conditionality for lone parents, couched in the punitive language of ‘crackdowns’. Especially distasteful is the latent double standard that’s often implied: it’s OK (or even preferable) for parents in couples to be out of work caring for their children, but single parents must be herded into work at all costs.

While there are challenges for all politicians here, it is the Conservatives who will need a seismic change in their language and political culture to live up to this pledge.

When David Cameron puts his name to an article suggesting single parents on income support looking after their young children are “paid to sit on the sofa” and in danger of “turning into Karen Matthews“, that is profoundly offensive. When Conservative Party policy documents describe single parent families as “broken families”, responsible for “Broken Britain”, that is profoundly offensive. When Cameron justifies his proposed tax break for married couples by saying “we will reward those who take responsibility” (implying that millions of hardworking cohabiting couples and single parents are necessarily being irresponsible), that is profoundly offensive.

Indeed, perhaps the best way to show support for the spirit of this pledge would be for the Tories to drop their proposed marriage tax break and instead give financial support to all families. Over half of all children in single parent families are in poverty, yet they would get nothing from it. That the Government should not pick and choose which children to support depending on the marital status of their parents is an important principle of fairness. Besides, it is perfectly possible to support the ideal of marriage without believing the tax system should discriminate against those who aren’t.

Early on in his leadership, David Cameron sought to reassure the public that the Conservatives had changed in their attitudes to single parents: “Not only is the war against lone parents over,” he declared, “but the weapons have been put permanently beyond use.” On current evidence, we should not rest easy until they have been publicly decommissioned.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Don’t underestimate Ed Miliband, David Davis warns Tories

    Don’t underestimate Ed Miliband, David Davis warns Tories

    David Davis has sent out a warning to his Conservative colleagues to underestimate Labour leader Ed Miliband at their peril. The Tory backbencher, who was beaten to the leadership in 2005 by David Cameron, told the Hull Daily Mail that just because “the media don’t like him” doesn’t mean Miliband won’t end up prime minister next year. “The media don’t like him and that translates into people picking up the same attitude. But I’m not as disparaging about Miliband as […]

    Read more →
  • News De Piero: Tories may outspend us, but we’ll out-campaign them

    De Piero: Tories may outspend us, but we’ll out-campaign them

    This week’s fundraising figures may show that the Conservatives will be able to outspend Labour in the run up to next year’s general election, but a fall in Tory membership means that we’ll be able to “out-body” them, according to Gloria De Piero. In an interview with The Guardian today, the Shadow Women and Equalities Minister explains how she is launching a campaign to connect with disengaged voters. Along with Deputy Chair of the Labour Party Jon Ashworth, De Piero […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Poll finds half of voters would pay more tax to fund NHS

    Poll finds half of voters would pay more tax to fund NHS

    Almost half of all voters would be willing to pay more tax if it meant funding the NHS, a new poll has found.   According to the ComRes survey in today’s Guardian, 49% of people would pay more if the money was going directly to the health service, while only 33% are opposed to the idea. 18% said they did not know. This is not the first indication that the general public are open to the idea of tax rises if […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The case for intervention: the Labour Party needs to find its feet in the post-Iraq era

    The case for intervention: the Labour Party needs to find its feet in the post-Iraq era

    In the decade since the invasion of Iraq many liberal societies have struggled with its legacy and how to move forward with foreign policy. The international community faces it’s next significant challenge; Isis, Kurdistan and Iraq. However, I cannot agree with Maya Goodfellow’s piece from earlier this week. To say that the foreign policy position of previous Labour governments has ‘put far too many peoples’ party membership cards at serious risk’ is not a good enough reason to allow hundreds of […]

    Read more →
  • News Tory ministers urge Osborne to cap rail fare rises

    Tory ministers urge Osborne to cap rail fare rises

    The Evening Standard have reported that high-level Tory minister are pressuring Chancellor George Osborne to cap average rail fare increases next year so that they don’t exceed inflation. In January, fail fares could rise up to nine times more than the average wage increase. It seems many Tories are worried that public discontent over such rapidly rising rail prices could manifest itself at the general election in May. In response, Patrick McLoughlin Secretary of State for Transport will allegedly lobby […]

    Read more →