Labour and Tories in first direct conflict on Twitter over Tory plans to limit child tax credits to lowest earners

February 11, 2010 3:21 pm

Twitter

By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

Commentators often pontificate over how the web will affect political campaigning during the general election. Will it affect how parties communicate with the media, or the electorate? Will online organisation give one party an advantage over the others?

Today, for the first time, Labour and the Tories entered direct combat over Twitter, with the official @UKLabour account and @SamuelCoates, the Tories’ new media guru and former Cameron speechwriter debating the merits of the parties’ respective policies in tweets to one another.

At 1pm this afternoon, @UKLabour tweeted:

How many families will be hit by Tory plans to restrict Child Tax Credits to families earning £31,000 or below? #AskGeorge

@SamuelCoates replied:

Lies: http://j.mp/ciVBA6 RT @UKLabour How many families will be hit by plans to restrict Child Tax Credits to families earning <£31,000?

@UKLabour responded, saying:

Read the IFS Green Budget p168 – http://tinyurl.com/ybh7trt

@SamuelCoates then said:

we’re committed to the £50,000 level

To which @UKLabour wrote:

Was Hammond wrong on £400m saving on factcheck today then? http://bit.ly/bHtYqs

Seeimngly flummoxed, Sam Coates didn’t reply for an hour, but @UKLabour persisted:

No response on that one?

@SamuelCoates has now said, simply:

Our policy is clear. You (whoever you are) are just scaremongering.

@UKLabour responded instantly, saying:

Either keep Child Tax Credit level at £50K or save £400m but you can’t do both.

The Tory policy is not clear — the IFS have said the Tories’ child tax credit plans, if they intend to save £400 million, would limit child tax credits to families earning over than £31,000 per year between them. The report @UKLabour referred to shows that families on modest and middle incomes would have to lose out for Conservative plans to add up.

IFS research was originally cited by George Osborne as confirmation that his plan to cut child tax credits would only mean ending support for families on combined incomes of over £50,000. In January, when George Osborne’s sums were called into question by Treasury data, the Tories said:

“Our estimates that this policy would save £400m were verified by the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies”.

However, the IFS’ Green Budget report spells out clearly that to reach the £400 million in savings that George Osborne said his plan would raise, the Tories would need to cut support for all families earning over £16,000 each.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →