Luciana Berger is a strong, committed candidate for Liverpool Wavertree – others should join the campaign, not criticise

February 16, 2010 11:40 am

Luciana BergerBy Dannie Grufferty / @DannieGruff

The fuss over the selection of Luciana Berger as PPC for Liverpool Wavertree is a storm in a very small, but enlarging, teacup. The storm symbolises Ricky Tomlinson’s pseudo-Scouse loyalty and the ‘regionalism’ of the prejudicial type; the teacup is our dear old collectively value-driven party.

Ricky is one thing, but one does wonder what drives Peter Kilfoyle to the local and national press on this issue. Admittedly, as the ‘mastermind’ of Blair’s leadership campaign, he may have a bitter taste in his mouth when he hears of up-and-coming ‘rising stars’. Peter has taken to backbench jeering in recent years and has told me so himself. But the student unions of Liverpool did not hold it against him when he failed to come sign a pledge asking him to “Come Clean” on fees as he promised, or when he didn’t turn up, as promised, to the NUS lobby of Parliament in November. Peter, if you want to sign the pledge committing yourself to supporting a fairer funding system, I have it ready for you. Ricky Tomlinson also said he would be in touch about speaking at our fees debate; he has still yet to send his apologies.

But this isn’t a critique of Peter Kilfoyle. Having a go at Government policy is one thing – Kilfoyle does it often enough and I have no doubt he generally means well – but to have a go at a recently selected PPC is unfair, particularly in this case. While myself and other students get out on the doorstep every week, many for Kilfoyle himself, he seems to think it’s OK to publicly criticise a candidate fighting to keep a key target seat for the Lib Dems in Labour’s column.

Students are a diverse bunch. The majority in Higher Education are part time, and almost a third here in Liverpool are over 26. They are not the stereo-typical 18-21 binge-drinking undergraduates. So it is unfair for Kilfoyle to criticse Luciana on the basis of her being what he calls a “student politician”.

Luciana’s experience outshone that of her opponents in the Parliamentary selection process – she has more than most people twice her age. Moreover, students represent 10% of the Wavertree constituency – that could easily swing the result here. Luciana is working hard to engage a cohort of society who often feel disaffected, and who vote proportionately less than other demographic groups. Yet she is criticised for it.

The assertion that she was selected merely on the basis that students supported her is a joke. For one thing, none of the other selection candidates ever approached us students for our support. If we therefore chose to support Luciana – who did ask for our support – that’s our prerogative. A few of us did get out on the doorstep for her in the run up to her selection, but surely other candidates should know that a selection, like a campaign, takes hard work, communication and organisation. Luciana worked very hard to get selected, approaching members who had never before been engaged in the local Party, and never previously spoken to a fellow member. Moreover, there were only a small handful – perhaps half a dozen – students who even voted in the selection. I have no doubt Luciana would have won whether students had campaigned for her or not.

These public outcries are not only unfairly damaging to the innocent individual – Luciana’s only ‘flaw’ is that she was born south of the Watford Gap – they are also unfairly perjorative of students. Imagine it the other way round. There’d be outage if remarks referred to any other group as if it were a homogeneous. Yet, some people within the Party think it’s perfectly acceptable to somehow blame students – who put hundreds of hours into Labour’s doorstep campaigning every week.

And on whether Luciana’s place on birth matters? Jane Kennedy, the incumbent MP here, wasn’t ‘local’. Luciana’s Lib Dem opponent Colin Eldridge certainly isn’t. Ricky Tomlinson hasn’t lived in Liverpoool for years, and he was born in Blackpool. People need to get over the post code obsession and realise that if Wavertree is going to put up a fight against the Lib Dems, we need the candidate who will fight the hardest. Luciana’s commitment has been proven during her selection campaign, as well as through her previous record within the NUS.

If we settle for second best for Labour, then the people of Liverpool Wavertree may well find themselves with a falky Lib Dem MP, and one who only signed NUS’s “Come Clean on Fees” pledge last week.

Most importantly of all, if we settle for second best in our Parliamentary selections, and if we split the vote at the election (that’s for you, Ricky), then we really will be handing power back to the Tories.




Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Labour have spoken out about complaints that Fiona Woolf QC, head of the public inquiry into historical sex abuse, has links with Leon Brittan. Brittan was the home secretary at the time when the dossier about alleged pedophiles went missing. And Woolf, who is also Lord Mayor of London, admitted yesterday that since 2008 she had dinner with Brittan and his family on five separate occasions but she has said she has “no close association” with him. A number of Labour MPs […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    Here we are again. Another week, another Wednesday, and another wrangle between Cameron and Miliband about the NHS. This is getting a bit old. Cameron attempted to get Miliband on the back foot – he kicked off PMQs by posing questions to the Labour leader about the Welsh NHS. Rather predictably, the rest of PMQs descended into the two party leaders arguing about who can be more trusted with the NHS. But, there was something a little more sinister about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    A couple of weeks ago saw the UK elect for the first time a UKIP MP – Douglas Carswell, with a huge majority of 12,000 votes. UKIP made enormous strides in the safe Labour seat of Heywood & Middleton as well, reducing the Labour majority from 5,971 to 617. This rise in the ‘acceptable’ far right should be a cause of concern not just to the Tories but also to us. It is clear from these results there is no […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    The result in Heywood and Middleton may have shocked some people, but not all. Some warned this could happen after UKIP took or seriously challenged safe council seats in the north, topped the national vote at the Euros, and polled strongly in Labour areas. Their highest average share of the vote in the 2014 elections came in Labour areas like Rotherham, Mansfield and Hartlepool. We’re told if we campaign on the “issues” people will come back to Labour. This fails […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Last night Young Labour voted on whether or not to come out in support of the free education demonstration set to take place on the 19th November. Reports suggest, they voted against the motion. This result could easily be interpreted as another sign that the argument against tuition fees is dead in the water. In reality, it tells us that opposite is true. The very fact that this was a topic for discussion at Young Labour’s national committee, that there […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y