Memo to Pickles: the answer to the Tory dilemma in Barking

February 2, 2010 6:38 pm

Eric PicklesBy Sunder Katwala / @nextleft

Paul Waugh has the very interesting scoop that the Tories appear to have taken seriously the idea of dropping out of the general election in Barking, or putting up a paper candidate and suspending their campaign.

They aren’t going to.

CCHQ had mused that it would reflect well on the party’s new shinynes and comfort with the multi-ethnic reality of modern Britain if it appeared willing to eschew narrow partisan interest to keep the racist candidate Nick Griffin out of the Commons. (The “right thing to do” comes with a fair dash of enlightened partisan self-interest on the national stage, so the thinking went, but let’s not quibble too much).

And they went so far as to consult Searchlight, who naturally told them that the plan could probably do rather more to harm than help to the anti-BNP cause. (Democratic parties not contesting the full slate of council seats in what looks like hopeless territory under FPTP is one of the factors that has helped the BNP get a foothold).

Back to the drawing board!

And you cynics at the back should also be prepared to give Tory CCHQ some credit for being worried about our shared democratic commitments.

So perhaps we can find some other way to achieve these desirable goals.

Perhaps without requiring the Tories to sacrifice their own interests.

Nor remove from the voters of Barking the chance to have a say on the big issues like the economy, tax, spending and debt between the major parties.

Hmm.

(Scratches head.)

Eureka!

What if we had preferential voting. Say, the Alternative Vote.

I’m sure I heard somebody talking about that earlier on.

The deal would go something like this:

Voters in Barking could vote for whoever they really wanted to win.

Then, if most of the voters wanted to keep Griffin out, they could achieve that too.

Easy as 1, 2, 3.

So we would find out whether Griffin or an opponent had most support, and I expect a majority would cast preferences for other democratic, non-racist candidates. (It is a scenario in which I would vote Tory, or cast a third preference for our democratic opponents on the right anyway!).

No pacts!

No mess!

Democracy!

So, Mr Eric Pickles, can’t you see the point?

This post was also published at Next Left.




Related posts:

  1. I fear what the future would hold for Barking and Dagenham if the BNP gets in
  2. Please come and help beat the BNP in Barking this Saturday
  3. Make Barking your new year’s resolution
  4. Our sacrifice is small: please join us in Barking this Saturday
  5. The Battle for Barking and Dagenham

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →