Swedish schools inspector says Swedish model favoured by Tories has not worked

February 9, 2010 5:28 pm

SchoolsBy Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

The Conservatives like the Swedish schools model so much, they’ve copied it and included it in their draft manifesto.

Michael Gove has repeatedly advocated the Swedish model, saying:

“We have seen the future in Sweden and it works…After 15 years, 900 new schools have been created and standards have been driven up. If it can work there it can work here.”

But last night, the head of Sweden’s independent national education agency – the Swedish equivalent of Ofsted – revealed that their school reforms have led to falling standards and rising segregation.

Speaking to Newsnight, Per Thullberg, general director of Skolverket, said that although students in the new schools may have better standards, it is because “they come from well-educated families”:

Watch the full Newsnight report here:

bbc

Michael Gove also claimed last night that Sweden had not seen rising segregation, but the Swedish version of Ofsted disagrees. In 2006, he said:

“Around half of the municipalities do not consider that the establishment of independent schools has led to increased segregation of the municipality’s pupils and around a third answered that this had led to increased segregation “to quite a small extent”. Almost 10% consider that increased segregation occurred “to quite a large extent” or “to a very large extent” as a result of independent schools being set up in the municipality.”

Some Tory councillors also have reservations about the Tory schools plans. Paul Carter, the Conservative leader of Kent County Council said recently:

“I’ve got enormous reservations. I’d like to talk about some of the consequences of freeing up too far. We have a duty to educate all children and if schools are going off randomly, setting out different standards, different rules and regulations, it’s very very difficult to have a coherent education system in a town, in a county the size and scale of Kent.”

Over the last 15 years Sweden has plummeted to the bottom of international league tables in maths and science. The recent international Trends in International Maths and Science Study (TIMSS) shows England was ranked several places higher than Sweden in both maths and science. In addition, between the last TIMSS report in 1995 and the most recent one conducted in 2007, the average score for Sweden went down in both subjects while scores for England went up in both subjects. In science, Sweden saw the biggest drop of any country in the study, while in maths Sweden saw the second largest drop after Bulgaria.

Labour’s schools secretary Ed Balls commented this afternoon that:

“The truth which the Tories hoped to brush under the carpet is now out. Michael Gove says he’s seen the future of schools policy in Sweden and he believes it works, but the independent head of Sweden’s Ofsted says it doesn’t. David Cameron and Michael Gove are not just ignoring the concerns leading Tory councillors have voiced in recent weeks, but are now trying to airbrush out of the picture all the evidence from Sweden about higher costs, falling standards and rising segregation.”

Last month, Ed Balls told me:

“In terms of the Swedish model, we should be careful on the judgement and the evidence of what has happened in Sweden. In Sweden all of the local groups setting up schools are doing so as profit-making organisations. They reduce standards for teacher entry, and the evidence is that they haven’t raised standards in schools – if anything they’ve led to greater difference in results depending on the income of the community, to less fairer outcomes rather than more.




Related posts:

  1. The Tories and schools: welcome to chaos
  2. The Tories’ draft education manifesto completely misunderstands modern schools
  3. Wise spending on the education budget? Faith schools must be phased out
  4. It’s time to phase out faith schools
  5. We can expand the number of co-op trust schools to more than 200 over the coming year

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →