A citizen’s pension is the best way to end pensioner poverty

March 26, 2010 2:15 pm

Pension

By Alexandra Kemp

It is time to start an important new debate around citizenship, age and income standards. Labour has taken one million pensioners out of poverty but two million pensioners are still in poverty. A Citizen’s Pension, paid universally to all, with a 15-year minimum residency qualification, could give certainty, a sense of dignity, material wellbeing and social inclusion to all pensioners.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation approves the level of the means tested Pension Credit Guarantee – currently £130 a week for single pensioner – as the baseline for an acceptable standard of pensioner income. But, a decade on, a quarter of pensioners do not claim their entitlement. The average unclaimed amount for Guarantee Credit is £68 a week.

Universality would the best way of reaching poorer pensioners and achieving maximum coverage for those whose low pay, exclusion from employer pension schemes and caring responsibilities mean they cannot accrue this level of entitlemnent.

In A New State Pension, Howard Reed, former Chief Economist at the ippr, costs the Citizen’s Pension at an additional 0.5% of GDP in 2030, reducing to an additional 0.4% in 2040. This is realistic: the UK is shown to be currently toward the bottom of a league table of OECD countries in a recent survey.

The Basic State Pension is only £95 a week and its value has been in terminal decline since 1980 when the Conservatives cut its link to average earnings. Labour’s above inflation increases in the state pension, the winter fuel allowance and Pension Credit have taken a third of pensioners out of poverty. This is the right direction of travel. But more needs to be done, as recent reforms to increase coverage of the basic state pension are not aligned with the second state pension.

Despite – or perhaps because of – the popular portrayal of benefit claimants as “scroungers”, thousands of pensioners will not claim what they are due, particularly homeowners who may not have been conversant with the benefits system during their working lives. They then often struggle to keep up with repairs to their homes, or other bills. As many as 81% of entitled owner-occupiers do not claim Pension Credit compared to 14% of renters who do not. Moreover, people are fearful of loss of other entitlements, giving out information to officials, the diminishing capacity to engage with bureaucracy, the frailness of old age when savings run out or interest rates decline – and there is a lack of accessible information.

UK Pension Reform is already in the right direction of travel. The new gender-fair measures being introduced to help women and family carers build up entitlement to the state pension this April will recognise and redress the impact that caring and the gender pension gap have on the ability to save for a pension. But we need to go further and think ahead. It could still take carers until 2040 to experience state pension outcomes similar to the rest of the population.

A Citizen’s Pension would recognise and give respect to the economic contribution of the self-employed, who are currently excluded from building up a second state pension. A Citizen’s Pension could be introduced in 2025 to float everyone above means-testing. This would make it pay to save for retirement, particularly for women, with an individual entitlement to a Citizen’s Pension at the level of the Guarantee Credit. It would also encourage saving in NESTS, the new universal company pension scheme to be introduced in 2012. It would reduce the risk of mis-selling claims, as it would always pay to save in a pension.

There would be winners and losers but it is a bold, far-sighted project which now merits a platform for wider debate.

Join us for the Citzen’s Pension debate on Monday March 29th from 6:15 pm until 7.30 pm, at the Houses of Parliament Committee Room 2. Speakers – Mervyn Kohler, Help the Aged; Malcolm Small Institute of Directors, Joanne Seagars, National Association of Pension Funds, Adrian Boulding, Legal and General, Howard Reed, former Chief Economist IPPR Chair: Baroness Patricia Hollis, House of Lords & Women and Pensions Network.

Related posts:

  1. Labour needs to make a bold statement on the state retirement pension
  2. We must claw back Fred the shred’s pension
  3. How can London Citizens go National?
  4. Gordon Brown has just spoken out on Radio Oxford about Fred the Shred’s pension. This is what he said…
  5. Labour campaign for a Citizens’ Convention on Constitutional Reform

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →