Does Iraqi politics value women candidates?

March 8, 2010 12:34 pm

Iraqi voter

By Ella Rolfe

International Women’s Day, following hot on the heels of the most important Iraqi election in five years, is not likely to get much attention here. But questions of women’s role in rebuilding Iraq feature high on both domestic and international agendas, and female election candidates have been touted as central to the process. In this election, even the Islamic parties have female candidates. So are they taken seriously?

The answer seems to be a disappointing ‘occasionally’. All parties are required to elect a quota of 25% women (although it’s not clear whether this will be enforced), so there will be candidates. But their competence and voter appeal are very often low, and many of them are unlikely to get much of the vote.

The quota and the paucity of women prepared – or free enough from social restrictions – to stand forces some parties to scramble to find female candidates. This means that many are unqualified; and they often fall down when challenged on policy issues.

Chicago’s DePaul University recently organised a debate for women candidates in the Kurdish city of Sulimaniyah. According to a friend who was there, the only candidate who got any applause – or indeed said anything worth hearing – was Bushra Al-Ubaidi, a Baghdad candidate for the Unity Alliance of Iraq. The fact that Al-Ubaidi was the most popular despite being the only Arab in the room underlined the failure of the other candidates to capture their audience. She is one of the few who are experienced, knowledgeable and confident enough to form and present opinions on the issues.

Because of this, woman candidates often lack respect. There is a joke going round Baghdad about one female candidate who appears in a niqab on her campaign posters, with only her eyes visible. How do we know, people say, if there is a Ms or a Mr under the veil?

Ala Talabani, one of Iraq’s most prominent woman politicians, feels there has been a small change in society towards credibility for women candidates. But, she says, given a choice both men and women will still go for the male candidate. If women voted for women, equality in Iraq’s parliament would be guaranteed; but, she told me, even the competent female candidate “will never get the vote she deserves.”

Parties are also guilty of undervaluing and under-investing in female candidates. In Kirkuk, Talabani tells me that men can be seen moving around much more than women on the campaign trail. While this could be due to social restrictions and security risks in the contested city, Talabani thinks it is partly due to a lack of support teams provided to women candidates. In Baghdad, a recent newspaper report exposed the expectations placed on women candidates: academic Fawziah Al-Jaberi said that she refused to stand because the party “asked me to sign a pledge to implement exactly their directions and orders if I won.” To Al-Jaberi, becoming a candidate under such restrictions would be “selling my attitude and personality” so she decided to keep out of the whole business.

Whatever the causal relationship between a lack of respect for women, the quota, and the low standard of many female candidates, women do have one very strong advantage. Especially in minority parties with only a few seats to fill and only one or two female candidates, the quota means that any woman who does stand is almost guaranteed to be elected.

Even a woman who gets hardly any votes stands a good chance. Iraq follows a complicated system of redistributing excess votes from the first 200 or so victorious candidates among other candidates, to fill the remaining 125-odd seats. This ‘overhead’ system is ostensibly meant to allow minority candidates a chance; but minority parties could also use it to fill their quotas, redistributing votes from a successful seat to secure victory for a woman in a seat where they have a female candidate.

The effect of the quota is therefore to virtually guarantee that while a proportion of Iraq’s MPs are female, not all of them will be well-qualified. In some cases it does get strong, competent women into parliament, but these cases are few. Under these circumstances, it is perhaps hardly surprising that neither Iraqi politics nor Iraqi voters much value female candidates.’

Related posts:

  1. Women and politics: is the future female?
  2. Selecting candidates: who do we want, and how do we get them?
  3. In our 50th year, the Young Fabians will launch a new programme for young women activists
  4. How to frustrate all-women shortlists
  5. Causes to fight for: women’s representation in politics

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →