Fit for the next century

March 11, 2010 2:35 pm

Rail Train

By Mike Katz

It’s a word that gets bandied about a tad too often, but today’s announcement on high speed rail by Lord Adonis can truly be called historic.

For a start, it’s a welcome attempt to restore Britain to its historical per-eminence when it comes to building railways. The sad fact is that there is more than 3,000 miles of high-speed track in mainland Europe, but only 60 miles in Britain. That must change.

And in terms of the ambition of the country and the time it will take to complete the lines, we need to have a historical perspective. This won’t be built overnight – construction won’t even start until 2017, so it is only right that Lord Adonis has tried to move this issue outside the political cycle. Even the Tories’ plans don’t see steel going down until 2015 – right at the end of the next term of government, whoever is in power.

Yet their shrillness on the high speed rail debate has more to do with losing political advantage than any deep policy differences. Yes, the Tories want the line to go via Heathrow whilst today’s plans opt for an interchange in West London with Crossrail. The independent HS2 team couldn’t make the business case for a Heathrow airport stack up. Yet Adonis has leant over backwards to encourage political consensus and has asked former Tory transport secretary Lord Mawhinney to look again at the Heathrow question.

For all their faults, the Lib Dems acknowledge this and were happy to discuss the government plans prior to publication. Tory refusal to do so was petty and more concerned with creating dividing lines than railway lines. It does them little credit.

But the future prize for the country is truly worth bearing with these ebb and flow of pre-election politics. A report from the Greengauge 21 lobby group has estimated that high speed rail could boost annual economic output in 2040 by between £17bn and £29bn and create between 25,000 and 42,000 additional jobs in Britain. The new lines would free up capacity on the existing routes for more passenger and freight services. And, of course, the potential for carbon savings is immense.

Lord Adonis is right: this is one policy worth not having an argument about. Now that the high speed rail express has left the station, every party needs to get behind it if we are to have a railway fit not just for this century, but the next.

Mike Katz is Chair of the Labour Transport Group. He writes in a personal capacity.

Related posts:

  1. Reaching out: how high-speed rail will benefit our economies and our communities
  2. Fast Forwards: Living in the new age of the train
  3. Proposal #10: Commit to building a national high-speed rail network
  4. Catch up with today’s political telly…
  5. Government to nationalise east coast railway

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →