You are here: Home » Archives »

Is Scotland facing two referendums?

March 17, 2010 5:23 pm

Author:

Share this Article

Saltire FlagBy Stuart MacLennan / @StuartMacLennan

Within the next year the Scottish Parliament will vote on the SNP’s Bill to hold a referendum on Scottish Independence. Barring any sudden change of heart by one of the other parties it is highly likely that the Parliament will swiftly dispose of these plans, but if it does pass then it is my contention that two referendums will be necessary.

 

Holding a referendum is a fairly recent addition to SNP policy. For decades the SNPs policy was that once they achieved a majority of MPs in Scotland they would treat that as a mandate to negotiate for Scottish independence. Once negotions had been concluded the settlement would then be put to the people in a referendum.

It remains the contention of the Scottish Government that this single referendum will be all that is required to satisfy the international community. However the fact remains that because of the nature of the devolution settlement the only question that could even be potentially competent for the Scottish Paliament to ask in a referendum is whether or not to negotiate a settlement with the UK Government.

However I contend that a second referendum will be necessary after the negotiations, because ultimately there remains the possibility the the Scottish government could negotiate a bad deal. By not having a decisive referendum after the negotiations, with the full final settlement laid before Scots voters, it could easily be said that the SNP Government have effectively been handed a blank cheque to pay any price for independence. Even after voting to negotiate for independence the Scottish people could decide that the price of independence is too high.

There is a significant body of precidence for this contention, most notably in Quebec. In their referendum in 1980 the Quebecian Governent sought a mandate to negotiate their independence in a referendum, which in the question explicitly stated that “any change in political status resulting from these negotiations will only be implemented with popular approval through another referendum”.

The SNP have misled the Scottish people and the international community about the legality of their plans. Without a second referendum any declaration of independence would be considered unilateral, and would put Scotland in the same place on the global stage as Kosovo. This, surely, demonstrates that the SNP’s plans are not thought-out, ill-advised and bad for Scotland.

Related posts:

  1. Labour – on your side in Scotland
  2. The state of play for Labour in Scotland
  3. Why should I vote for a Labour party bent on its own destruction in Scotland?
  4. ockerbie: full marks to Scotland’s Mr MacAskill
  5. Make all prescriptions free – they already are in Scotland and Wales

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Featured Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    By Ian Stewart

    A cleaner met me on the corridor the other day as I was leaving the office and gave me a huge hug. “Thank you, City Mayor,” she told me “that’s been the best news for years.” After I had recovered from my embarrassment, I realised what she was talking about. Salford had just introduced the full Living Wage – becoming the first local authority in Greater Manchester to implement a full Living Wage of £7.45 for every member of staff [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    By David Robinson

    In four weeks time the Chancellor will announce the results of the 2015 spending Review. There won’t be many winners but some will have lost more than others. Political commentators and discussion forums will pass judgement and public sector managers will, yet again, pick through the debris, making do and mending from what ever they can salvage. Before we get overtaken by the detail we should reflect on the bigger picture. What ever the chancellor says on June 26th it [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment A call for action at the G8

    A call for action at the G8

    By Ivan Lewis

    In less than a month’s time, the UK hosts the G8 Summit. With hunger, tax, trade and transparency all on the agenda, the UK has a unique opportunity to show global leadership on these issues. The scale of hunger is devastating. There is enough food in the world for everyone, yet 1 billion people still go hungry. 2.3 million children every year die from malnutrition – to put that in perspective, that is around 16,000 children every day. Or one [...]

    Read more →
  • News TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run “The TUC along with its international equivalent – the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) – is calling on UEFA to address the appalling treatment of workers and players in Qatar and [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    By Mark Ferguson

    The Labour Party spends a great deal of time beating itself up over its performance in Southern England. We know it simply isn’t good enough, but we can’t seem to put our finger on why exactly that’s the case. Is it demographics? No. Culture? Perhaps. Lack of basic party organisation in some areas? It’s certainly a factor. But whilst we’re flagellating ourselves over our inability to perform south of the Watford gap (outside of London), we should remember that the [...]

    Read more →