It’s time for Labour to lead: No more Lords

March 31, 2010 5:23 pm

Author:

Share this Article

House of Lords

By Pam Giddy

13 years ago Labour swept to power promising “New Labour, New Britain”. Transformation of our constitution was a major plank of the commitments undertaken, and while devolution, freedom of information and the Human Rights Act have changed the UK forever, we still feel far from the democratic and accountable House of Lords we were promised.

Defenders of the status quo claim that, despite its rag tag composition, the House of Lords is an important check on the executive and seems to see higher quality debate than the Commons. But calling for a democratic and accountable Lords in no way runs contrary to the logic of checks and balances – it simply asks that lawmakers themselves be checked and balanced with real public accountability.

Likewise, when the public clearly yearn for the presence of people with real world experience in Parliament the problem is clearly not that democracy and expertise are incompatible. We simply need to be imaginative in creating the process by which one would be elected to the Lords, so it doesn’t replicate or compete with its noisy neighbour down the corridor.

While we debate pros and cons, let’s not forget the scandals that have spewed out from the Lords these recent years – cash for questions, cash for honours, the outrage of non-dom donors buying our politics from its benches, and most recently the “cash for influence” affair. Let’s not forget the indignation we all felt as John Butterfill confidently boasted “It is quite likely that I will go to the Lords…another string to my bow as far as you’re concerned”.

That’s why we at Power2010, together with LabourList and Progress among others are laying down the gauntlet – No more Lords! The Labour government has an incredible opportunity to prove itself as a party of democratic renewal in the wake of these Lordly scandals and in the political landscape still framed by the expenses crisis.

As the dissolution of parliament approaches all three main parties will be readying themselves to send in their next wave of appointments. If the Labour leadership really believes in a democratic House of Lords, should it not decide today that there will be no additional appointment to the upper chamber?

The Labour Party should take a stand and prove its credibility by issuing a challenge to the Conservatives and Lib Dems – “we won’t if you won’t”. No party can be taken seriously on a “democratic House of Lords” while continuing to stuff it full of new appointments, and the first party to rise to this challenge would send a clear message to the public – the days of the rotten parliament are over and we are the party to change things for good. As Alex Smith wrote, Lords reform goes to the heart of Labour’s story. 100 years ago, in 1910, the party ran a simple campaign, “The Lords Must Go” – it’s time to win it.

Some feel that given the challenges we face as a country – the economy, the environment, public services – tinkering with the second chamber is way down the list. But these people forget the equally damaging crisis we face today – a crisis in our politics which threatens to challenge the legitimacy of our democracy. Reforming the Lords, starting with a moratorium on further appointments would sent a strong message to all voters – that the Labour Party believe in action and not just words when in comes to political reform and rebuilding trust. No more Lords.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    With much jubilation, the 3rd reading of the same-sex marriage bill passed the House of Commons last night, carried through on the weight of Labour votes, but how have individual MPs voted on this bill? In the 2nd reading of the equal marriage bill, Labour MP voting totals were: 217 – for 22 – against 14 – non-voters For the third reading 192 – for 14 – against 49 – non-voters —————————————————————- 192 Labour MPs who voted yes on 3rd reading (9 didn’t [...]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Speaking at the Google Big Tent event Ed Miliband said (please note, Miliband spoke without notes, but this is the text released by the party): It is great to be here inside the Google Big Tent. My sons Daniel and Sam think I do a very boring job, so they will be excited when I tell them I appeared along with the “Killer Robots” and the “Captain of the Moonshots” at your sessions. I’d like to start by showing you [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Unions The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    Lord Mandelson, or Baron Mandelson of Foy, as he should be referred to since he was packed off to the House of Lords by a small cabal, recently accused the Unite union of ‘manipulating selection procedures’ in the Labour Party. He went on to warn Ed Miliband that this ‘stores up danger for a future Labour government’. Irony has always been in as short supply as sheer chutzpah has been plentiful with old Mandy – but since his faithful disciple [...]

    Read more →
  • News Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Cameron says no more EU-turns “After one of his most difficult weeks since becoming prime minister, David Cameron put in a polished and assured peformance on the Today programme this morning. The most notable line came on Europe, with Cameron [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Miliband is off to speak to Google – but it’s not all about tax avoidance

    Miliband is off to speak to Google – but it’s not all about tax avoidance

    Ed Miliband is speaking at the Google “Big Tent” event this morning, and as we noted earlier this week, he’s picking a bit of a fight with them over their tax affairs. Understandably, most of the press coverage in advance of Miliband’s speech (and presumably afterwards too) is about Google’s tax affairs. That’s in part due to David Cameron’s unwillingness to challenge his adviser, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, when the two met earlier this week. The Downing Street media team [...]

    Read more →