It’s time to stop running scared over the union link

March 15, 2010 8:29 am

Unions

By Darrell Goodliffe

Let’s be quite frank. Lord Adonis’s ‘intervention’ in the BA/Unite dispute was a disgrace. Rather than take at least a balanced view Adonis laid into Unite:

“It’s totally unjustified, this strike, on the merits of the issues at stake, and I do call on the union to engage constructively with the company.”

I struggled in vain to find remarks from Adonis condemning the outrageous way that BA used the courts to quash the first strike ballot; or indeed, condemnation of the fact that it was BA’s management that withdrew the latest offer at the 11th hour. Such a one-sided bias on a topic like this should not be expected from a Labour minister; Unite and Labour members are entitled to expect and demand better from our leaders.

This should not be misread. Though personally I am sympathetic to Unite’s case, what I don’t realistically expect is blind subservience to the union line. However, that cuts both ways – what makes Adonis’s remarks beyond the pale in my eyes is that they are blindly subservient, but to the other side.

Gordon Brown, attempting to strong-arm the union back to work, doesn’t rank much better than Adonis in the mediator stakes. Underpinning the remarks of Adonis and actions of Brown is a deep-seated fear on the part of the leadership that being seen to be close to the unions will be politically damaging as the right-wing press and the Conservatives desperately scramble to cobble together a case that Labour is at the beck-and-call of its union ‘paymasters’.

But the Conservative attacks are delusional and our leadership’s paranoia is annoying to say the least; neither realise the fact the climate has changed since the late 1970s and early ’80s. People don’t exactly love the unions but they don’t hate them either and while the Conservative attacks may fire the hearts of the faithful they do not plant seeds of doubt in the minds of the swing voter. When people think of vested interests they think of banks and the City. The nervous middle-class swing voter – especially if employed in the public sector – is likely to be supporting the last bulwark of unionism, and is hardly likely to take fright at the “beer and sandwiches” bogeymen invoked by the Telegraph et al. Put simply, people are not in the mood to care too much if Labour is in the pocket of the unions or not.

But there is a broader point. The union link is something that makes Labour different. Presented the correct way it’s actually something that could benefit us in the polls. If unions were prepared to broaden their base in partnership with the Labour Party and become rooted in their local communities (rather than predominantly in the workplace) they could be on the cusp of a renaissance.

So, rather than running scared of the union link, we should be cherishing, nourishing and nurturing it. Labour’s leadership should remember that it’s 2010, not 1983. If we continue to run scared of our past, it shows that we have in fact not taken the correct lessons from it, and as a party are prisoner of it. The next election is all about the future both of Britain and of the Labour Party; the one-sided sniping of the likes of Lord Adonis has no place in that future.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Video Ed Miliband’s surprise visit to Afghanistan

    Ed Miliband’s surprise visit to Afghanistan

    Read more →
  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →