It’s time to stop running scared over the union link

March 15, 2010 8:29 am

Unions

By Darrell Goodliffe

Let’s be quite frank. Lord Adonis’s ‘intervention’ in the BA/Unite dispute was a disgrace. Rather than take at least a balanced view Adonis laid into Unite:

“It’s totally unjustified, this strike, on the merits of the issues at stake, and I do call on the union to engage constructively with the company.”

I struggled in vain to find remarks from Adonis condemning the outrageous way that BA used the courts to quash the first strike ballot; or indeed, condemnation of the fact that it was BA’s management that withdrew the latest offer at the 11th hour. Such a one-sided bias on a topic like this should not be expected from a Labour minister; Unite and Labour members are entitled to expect and demand better from our leaders.

This should not be misread. Though personally I am sympathetic to Unite’s case, what I don’t realistically expect is blind subservience to the union line. However, that cuts both ways – what makes Adonis’s remarks beyond the pale in my eyes is that they are blindly subservient, but to the other side.

Gordon Brown, attempting to strong-arm the union back to work, doesn’t rank much better than Adonis in the mediator stakes. Underpinning the remarks of Adonis and actions of Brown is a deep-seated fear on the part of the leadership that being seen to be close to the unions will be politically damaging as the right-wing press and the Conservatives desperately scramble to cobble together a case that Labour is at the beck-and-call of its union ‘paymasters’.

But the Conservative attacks are delusional and our leadership’s paranoia is annoying to say the least; neither realise the fact the climate has changed since the late 1970s and early ’80s. People don’t exactly love the unions but they don’t hate them either and while the Conservative attacks may fire the hearts of the faithful they do not plant seeds of doubt in the minds of the swing voter. When people think of vested interests they think of banks and the City. The nervous middle-class swing voter – especially if employed in the public sector – is likely to be supporting the last bulwark of unionism, and is hardly likely to take fright at the “beer and sandwiches” bogeymen invoked by the Telegraph et al. Put simply, people are not in the mood to care too much if Labour is in the pocket of the unions or not.

But there is a broader point. The union link is something that makes Labour different. Presented the correct way it’s actually something that could benefit us in the polls. If unions were prepared to broaden their base in partnership with the Labour Party and become rooted in their local communities (rather than predominantly in the workplace) they could be on the cusp of a renaissance.

So, rather than running scared of the union link, we should be cherishing, nourishing and nurturing it. Labour’s leadership should remember that it’s 2010, not 1983. If we continue to run scared of our past, it shows that we have in fact not taken the correct lessons from it, and as a party are prisoner of it. The next election is all about the future both of Britain and of the Labour Party; the one-sided sniping of the likes of Lord Adonis has no place in that future.

Related posts:

  1. The Labour-Union link is about more than money
  2. Conservatives “running scared” on schools policy
  3. It’s time for Labour to walk the Trade Union walk
  4. Time is running out for PR
  5. Want a career? Call your union

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →