Labour’s plans for a fully elected second chamber

March 13, 2010 11:54 pm

Labour clears the way House Lords

By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

The Sunday Telegraph has the story that Jack Straw is to discuss with cabinet plans to include a move towards a fully elected, 300-member strong second chamber.

The Telegraph says:

“Under the government’s proposals, members of the new chamber would be able to be subject to a US-style “recall ballot” which would disqualify them for incompetence.”

“The plans would see all members of the new-look assembly being directly elected – ending the system of party patronage – with polling under some form of proportional representation system taking place at the same time as general elections.”

“One third of the new chamber would be elected on each occasion – with members serving three terms, up to 15 years, once elected in a similar system to the one in use to choose members of the US Senate.

“Under the plans, ministers could only be appointed from peers who had been elected – bringing to an end the “GOATS” system which has seen Gordon Brown choosing as members of his government people from outside politics whom he has appointed peers.

“In the event of death, members would be replaced without the need for by-elections under some sort of “best loser” system. Members would be paid a salary which has yet to be fixed – but it would almost certainly be less than the £64,766 currently paid to backbench MPs.”

With so little time before the election for new legislation, the plans may make up part of Labour’s manifesto – and show the Tories, who would likely oppose the plans, as the party of the status quo over change.

A fully elected second chamber was the fourth most popular policy proposal in LabourList’s “New Ideas for a Renewed Movement” series last summer, in which nearly 1,000 people voted. Responding to the proposal, Labour’s manifesto co-ordinator Ed Miliband wrote in January:

“A fully elected House of Lords – Britain needs a new constitutional and political settlement for a new era. Our immediate task is completing the removal of the hereditary principle from the House of Lords. But we will also ask for a clear mandate to make the Lords accountable and genuinely democratic.”

Related posts:

  1. Proposal #15: Labour must clear the way to a fully elected House of Lords
  2. I don’t fully trust the government on public spending either
  3. Whatever Cameron does if he’s elected, he won’t disappoint
  4. Osborne’s FSA plans lift lid on Tory links to city
  5. Carwyn Jones elected Labour leader in Wales

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →